Possibly - Your default gateway on the host is set to your internal 192.*
gateway? What does route -n say?

Thanks,
Amogh

On 10/11/13 9:18 AM, "motty cruz" <motty.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Thank you for your reply, I blow out my installation, started from
>scratch;
>you mentioned that we don't configure bridge for guest VLAN traffic but
>Cloudstack did not configure it automatically. Also, I noticied after
>installed cloudstack-agent and configure advance zone four new interfaces
>appear vnet0 - vnet3. I don't know what that is.
>root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show
>bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>cloud0          8000.fe00a9fe025f       no              vnet0
>cloudbr0                8000.0015177b6765       no              eth0
>                                                        vnet2
>cloudbr1                8000.0015177b6764       no              eth1
>                                                        vnet1
>                                                        vnet3
>virbr0          8000.525400643b18       yes             virbr0-nic
>
>after re-installing Cloudstack-management on the management server and
>Cloudstack-agent on the KVM host configure two bridge cloudbr0 for
>public/guest and Cloudbr1 for managemen/storage, now my system VMs are
>running but when trying to download and iso, I get the follwoing error "No
>route to host",
>here is my cloudbr0 bridge for public/guest traffic
>[root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0
>DEVICE=cloudbr0
>ONBOOT=yes
>TYPE=Bridge
>IPADDR=xxx.xxxx.xxx
>GATEWAY=xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx
>NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>DNS1=8.8.8.8
>
>base on eth0
>DEVICE=eth0
>HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65
>ONBOOT=yes
>BRIDGE=cloudbr0
>
>Thanks again,
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
>sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please post management server log and agent log from kvm (with debug
>> enabled) to find out the issue .
>> We don't have to created bridge with guest vlan for guest traffic.
>> Cloudstack will configure it automatically on kvm when required.
>>
>> -Sanjeev
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:50 PM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
>>
>> Hi,
>> I posted this problem in the past and got no help, so I'm trying my luck
>> again I install CS 4.2, configure advance zone for KVM cluster here is
>>my
>> brctl
>> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show
>> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>> cloud0          8000.fe00a9fe0212       no              vnet0
>> cloudbr0                8000.0015177b6765       no              eth0
>>                                                         vnet1
>>                                                         vnet3
>> cloudbr1                8000.0015177b6764       no              eth1
>>                                                         vnet2
>> cloudbr99               8000.0015177b6764       no              eth1.99
>> virbr0          8000.52540089a4da       yes             virbr0-nic
>>
>> I'm using inteface eth0 for management
>> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0
>> DEVICE=eth0
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> BRIDGE=cloudbr0
>>
>> here is bridge for eth0
>> DEVICE=cloudbr0
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> TYPE=Bridge
>> IPADDR=192.168.0.10
>> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>> GATEWAY=192.168.0.1
>> DNS1=8.8.8.8
>>
>> I'm using eth1 for public/guest
>> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1
>> DEVICE=eth1
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> BRIDGE=cloudbr1
>>
>> here is bridge to public network untag in vlan 1 by default
>> DEVICE=cloudbr1
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> TYPE=Bridge
>> IPADDR=98.234.34.208
>> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>>
>> I created VLAN 99 for guest traffic
>> DEVICE=eth1.99
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> VLAN=yes
>> BRIDGE=cloudbr99
>>
>> DEVICE=cloudbr99
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> TYPE=Bridge
>> IPADDR=10.1.1.2
>> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>> DNS1=8.8.8.8
>>
>> I'm using CLVM for primary storage, I noticed system vms were created
>> lvm> lvscan
>>   inactive      
>>'/dev/hitachi-1/c490e01b-4e40-40fb-aa56-fbedd89b86cd'
>> [1.95 GiB] inherit
>>   inactive      
>>'/dev/hitachi-1/ec032d27-26a4-467b-a1da-222402eedd60'
>> [1.95 GiB] inherit
>>   ACTIVE            '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_root' [189.20 GiB] inherit
>>   ACTIVE            '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_swap' [31.51 GiB] inherit
>> lvm>
>>
>> here is my age.properties file:
>> #Storage
>> #Thu Oct 10 09:47:57 PDT 2013
>> guest.network.device=cloudbr99
>> workers=5
>> private.network.device=cloudbr0
>> port=8250
>> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
>> pod=1
>> zone=1
>> guid=10d96879-df46-3b97-9428-85e2934e0b95
>> public.network.device=cloudbr1
>> cluster=1
>> local.storage.uuid=7c563a7d-e257-48da-9133-cf5ae8973761
>> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
>> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
>> host=192.168.0.5
>>
>>
>> but System VMs are not starting, can someone tell me if VLAN are
>>configure
>> right?
>>
>> log:
>> 2013-10-10 10:17:58,838 DEBUG [network.lb.LBHealthCheckManagerImpl]
>> (LBHealthCheck-1:null) LB HealthCheck Manager is running and getting the
>> updates from LB providers and updating service status
>>
>> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
>> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
>> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
>> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>

Reply via email to