On 15 November 2013 15:47, m...@kelceydamage.com <m...@kelceydamage.com> wrote:
> The only people I have seen that have macro VMs working was some company > out of Boston making virtual router/networking services with special > interconnects that allowed process/thread striping over multiple > hosts/sockets. > > Sent from my HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Cores from Multiple Physical Hosts in VM > Date: Fri, Nov 15, 2013 2:08 AM > > On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Robert Gabriel <epheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to do the below? > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Answered by sgordon: > > > > It is my understanding that this is not currently possible, there was > some > > discussion at the design summit (I think in the Libvirt driver roadmap > > session) about making the scheduler NUMA aware which would allow such > > configurations on hardware that supports NUMA but this is currently > > unimplemented. > > > > In reply to ephemeric's question: Cores from Multiple Physical Hosts in > VM > > > > Tags: vcpus, aggregates, hosts, multiple, physical. > > > > Hi, > > > > Pardon my ignorance as I have never looked at cloud computing. > > > > Is it possible to create a VM and assign to it cores from multiple > physical > > hosts for high vcpu numbers? > > > > We have the following problem: Splunk running 38 concurrent searches on a > > blade that only has 16 cores. > > > > By creating a VM and combining the cores from two blades, hence 32 vcpus > in > > total somehow? > > As far as I know this is not possible. > > That said I would be very surprise if Splunk could not use multiple > machines. So just run multiple instances (separate VMs) that point to the > same data store. > > > > > I'm not sure if this is possible. > > > > Thank you. > > > > To change frequency, language and content of these alerts, please visit > your > > user profile< > https://ask.openstack.org/en/users/2044/ephemeric/subscriptions/>. > > > > > > If you believe that this message was sent in an error, please email about > > it the forum administrator at communitym...@openstack.org. > Thank you, at least gives me a direction.
