Interesting so its suported to have 2 staging nfs. Great.

Thx Sanjeev
On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, "Sanjeev N" <sanj...@apache.org> wrote:

> yes all the existing nfs storages will be converted to staging storage
> after migrating from nfs to s3.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Nice to hear that :)
> >
> > Sanjeev, is migration api supported if we use 2 nfs boxes now for
> secondary
> > storage or if it must be only 1 nfs box(that will ve converted to staging
> > store)?
> > Thx
> > On May 29, 2015 11:02 AM, "Sanjeev N" <sanj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > No issues with S3 provider.
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andrija Panic <
> andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
> > > > ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template
> > from
> > > > URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems
> > deleting
> > > > any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent,
> in
> > > > contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS,
> > afaik)
> > > >
> > > > MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads
> systemVM
> > > > template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com)
> -
> > > so
> > > > there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.
> > > >
> > > > S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much
> > > better
> > > > - but we are still to test it all later...
> > > >
> > > > :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool
> <prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >     Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if
> > yes
> > > > > please share the instructions for it.
> > > > >    How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
> > > > > Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Andrija Panić
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to