> Each address between 10.13.0.150 and 10.13.0.199 is listed But are any of these available or all are taken?
> But what about 10.13.0.2 to 10.13.0.149? Either this range was never added or it was remove. Check the table "vlan". Regards, Somesh -----Original Message----- From: Martin Emrich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 8:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: AW: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left) Thanks... I checked the table. Each address between 10.13.0.150 and 10.13.0.199 is listed. But what about 10.13.0.2 to 10.13.0.149? I could not find an address range limit via the GUI, but there seems to be one (which I might even have configured myself some time ago)... Ciao Martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Somesh Naidu [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2015 18:25 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left) Martin, Can you check the user_ip_address table and see if the IPs in that network are marked as being used (though incorrectly). Regards, Somesh -----Original Message----- From: Martin Emrich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left) Hi! One of my shared networks seems to think it is full: - In the GUI, it no longer appeared as a choice for creating a new instance - Attempting to create one via cloudmonkey resulted in the error "Insufficient address capacity". After deleting some VMs in this network, it worked again. Interestingly, there are currently only 47 hosts in this network, which should have 253 addresses in total (/24). I could not find a global setting which could limit the number of IP addresses to use, and the account (ROOT admin) is unlimited. Any ideas? Thanks Martin
