Is there an entry for this MAC on the VR in /etc/dhcphosts.txt ? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cristian Ciobanu" <cristian.c@istream.today> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, 13 December, 2015 15:52:38 > Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue > I set back to dhcp, when the VM ask VR for IP, i see the following events on > VR > logs : > > > ==> dnsmasq.log <== > Dec 13 15:50:29 dnsmasq-dhcp[9457]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:47:4c:00:00:28 > ignored > Dec 13 15:50:31 dnsmasq-dhcp[9457]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:47:4c:00:00:28 > ignored > Dec 13 15:50:38 dnsmasq-dhcp[9457]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 06:47:4c:00:00:28 > ignored > > > Regards, > Cristian > > On 12/13/2015 4:42:36 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > Ok, this is weird, DHCP traffic should not be blocked anywhere. Also stop > ebtables just in case and repeat, but if you remove the statically assigned IP > and manually run "dhclient eth0", does it get an IP? What do the logs on the > VR > say? > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Sunday, 13 December, 2015 14:36:35 >> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue > >> Hi Lucian, >> >> Yes, the firewall is off. >> >> When i set the network from dhcp to static for VM TEST3 i was able to >>ping the >> gateway and google.com ( i used the same IP allocated to VM in >>cloudstack from >> that range) >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> Regards, >> Cristian >> >> >> On 12/13/2015 1:42:05 PM, Nux! wrote: >> Looks ok at the first sight? >> Have you stopped iptables on the HV? >> >> If you manually set an IP from the range on TEST3, are you able to ping the >> VR >> IP or the TEST2 VM? >> What is "arp -a" saying? >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>> Sent: Sunday, 13 December, 2015 10:49:10 >>> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue >> >>> i forgot to add "brctl show" info in previous email. >>> >>> >>> [root@hostxxx ~]# brctl show >>> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >>> cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe0089 no vnet0 >>> vnet3 >>> vnet7 >>> cloudbr0 8000.000000000000 yes >>> cloudbr1 8000.0cc47a6966cb no eth1 >>> vnet1 >>> vnet10 >>> vnet2 >>> vnet4 >>> vnet5 >>> vnet6 >>> vnet8 >>> vnet9 >>> virbr0 8000.525400ac1c4a yes virbr0-nic >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Cristian >>> >>> >>> On 12/13/2015 12:37:11 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote: >>> Hi Lucian, >>> >>> Please see the requested information, also the VM are in the same >>>bridge. >>> >>> VR XML : >>> >>> [root@host001 ~]# virsh dumpxml r-58-VM >>> >>> r-58-VM >>> 1db38c1e-ea4d-4c3a-a401-263d10020de2 >>> Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit) >>> 262144 >>> 262144 >>> 1 >>> >>> 500 >>> >>> >>> >>> Apache Software Foundation >>> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor >>> 1db38c1e-ea4d-4c3a-a401-263d10020de2 >>> >>> >>> >>> hvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> destroy >>> restart >>> destroy >>> >>> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> TEST2 VM with connection : >>> >>> [root@host001 ~]# virsh dumpxml i-2-59-VM >>> >>> i-2-59-VM >>> 4e95e133-4ce6-4954-aaf8-547cb77e5e7a >>> CentOS 5.5 (64-bit) >>> 524288 >>> 524288 >>> 1 >>> >>> 1000 >>> >>> >>> >>> Apache Software Foundation >>> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor >>> 4e95e133-4ce6-4954-aaf8-547cb77e5e7a >>> >>> >>> >>> hvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> destroy >>> restart >>> destroy >>> >>> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> TEST3 VM no connection : >>> >>> [root@host001 ~]# virsh dumpxml i-2-60-VM >>> >>> i-2-60-VM >>> eadc00f4-bc9b-4b23-8874-a510eb8c021b >>> CentOS 5.5 (64-bit) >>> 524288 >>> 524288 >>> 1 >>> >>> 1000 >>> >>> >>> >>> Apache Software Foundation >>> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor >>> eadc00f4-bc9b-4b23-8874-a510eb8c021b >>> >>> >>> >>> hvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> destroy >>> restart >>> destroy >>> >>> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Cristian >>> www.istream.today [http://www.istream.today/] >>> www.shape.host [http://www.shape.host/] >>> +40.733.955.922 >>> >>> On 12/12/2015 11:14:23 PM, Nux! wrote: >>> Cristian, >>> >>> This is weird. On the HV can you check "brctl show" both the VR interface as >>> well as the VMs in the same bridge? >>> You can get their vnets by way of "virsh dumpxml name". >>> Also, before you repeat any tests, please disable iptables on the HV >>> (service >>> iptables stop). >>> >>> Lucian >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux! >>> www.nux.ro >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>> Sent: Saturday, 12 December, 2015 16:44:19 >>>> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue >>> >>>> Hi Lucian, >>>> >>>> I did what you told me, I also find something interesting on VR dnsmasq >>>>log, >>>> please see the screenshot and the syslog from this mail. >>>> >>>> You will see the VR show MAC address ignored for TEST3, i'm not sure why. >>>> >>>> Screenshots : http://imgur.com/a/HHYUr >>>> >>>> Syslog: >>>> >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.084419] RPC: Registered named UNIX >>>> socket transport module. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.084419] RPC: Registered udp >>>> transport >>>> module. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.084419] RPC: Registered tcp >>>> transport >>>> module. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.084419] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 >>>> backchannel transport module. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.111188] FS-Cache: Loaded >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.134041] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' >>>> registered >>>> for caching >>>> Nov 9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [ 187.163769] Installing knfsd >>>> (copyright (C) >>>> 1996 o...@monad.swb.de). >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [ 192.071255] Netfilter messages via >>>> NETLINK >>>> v0.30. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [ 192.079893] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 >>>> (1959 >>>> buckets, 7836 max) >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: using user-space event >>>> filtering >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: netlink event socket >>>> buffer >>>> size has been set to 262142 bytes >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: initialization completed >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11432]: -- starting in daemon >>>> mode -- >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [ 192.081523] ctnetlink v0.93: >>>> registering >>>> with nfnetlink. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: started, version 2.62 cachesize >>>> 150 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: compile time options: IPv6 >>>> GNU-getopt >>>> DBus i18n IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP conntrack >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: reading /etc/resolv.conf >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: using nameserver 8.8.4.4#53 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: using nameserver 8.8.8.8#53 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: read /etc/hosts - 4 addresses >>>> Nov 9 11:20:09 systemvm kernel: [ 193.428232] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 >>>> Netfilter Core Team >>>> Nov 9 11:20:09 systemvm kernel: [ 193.447974] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006 >>>> Netfilter Core Team >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11917]: setsockopt recvref[30]: Protocol >>>> not >>>> available >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11917]: This binary does not support kernel >>>> L2TP. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: xl2tpd version xl2tpd-1.3.1 >>>> started on >>>> systemvm PID:11918 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Written by Mark Spencer, Copyright >>>> (C) >>>> 1998, Adtran, Inc. >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Forked by Scott Balmos and David >>>> Stipp, >>>> (C) 2001 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Inherited by Jeff McAdams, (C) 2002 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Forked again by Xelerance >>>> (www.xelerance.com) (C) 2006 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Listening on IP address 0.0.0.0, >>>> port >>>> 1701 >>>> Nov 9 11:20:42 systemvm /usr/sbin/irqbalance: Balancing is ineffective on >>>> systems with a single cache domain. Shutting down >>>> Nov 9 11:20:59 systemvm KVP: KVP starting; pid is:18270 >>>> Nov 9 11:21:36 systemvm shutdown[21010]: shutting down for system halt >>>> Nov 9 11:21:36 systemvm init: Switching to runlevel: 0 >>>> Nov 9 11:21:37 systemvm KVP: KVP starting; pid is:21036 >>>> Nov 9 11:21:37 systemvm KVP: recvfrom failed; pid:21036 error:2 No such >>>> file or >>>> directory >>>> Nov 9 11:21:37 systemvm init: Re-reading inittab >>>> Nov 9 11:21:37 systemvm conntrack-tools[11432]: ---- shutdown received >>>> ---- >>>> Nov 9 11:21:39 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: exiting on receipt of SIGTERM >>>> Nov 9 11:21:39 systemvm acpid: exiting >>>> Nov 9 11:21:39 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: death_handler: Fatal signal 15 >>>> received >>>> Nov 9 11:21:39 systemvm ntpd[1732]: ntpd exiting on signal 15 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Multumesc ! >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Cristian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/12/2015 1:38:43 PM, Nux! wrote: >>>> Cristian, >>>> >>>> So adding the IPs is not a problem, I see a few subnets added there. >>>> >>>> I see TEST3 should have got an IP address ending in 165, but has not. >>>> Can you check /var/log/messages (/var/log/syslog) on the VM and the VR, >>>> see if >>>> you see anything regarding DHCP, the VM's MAC address and so on. >>>> Also, if you restart the network on the VM or simply run `dhclient eth0`, >>>> do you >>>> get an IP? >>>> >>>> Lucian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>> >>>> Nux! >>>> www.nux.ro >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 21:23:12 >>>>> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue >>>> >>>>> I removed the URL and i did a re-upload of the screenshots because i >>>>> forgot to >>>>> hide some IP. ( also one of the server was compromised ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> NEW URL: http://imgur.com/a/0qmvx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Cristian >>>>> www.istream.today [http://www.istream.today/] >>>>> www.shape.host [http://www.shape.host/] >>>>> +40.733.955.922 >>>>> >>>>> On 12/11/2015 7:09:57 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote: >>>>> Please see the screenshots from following URL: http://imgur.com/a/Fbbyi >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Cristian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12/11/2015 5:38:30 PM, Nux! wrote: >>>>> Cristian, >>>>> >>>>> The mailing list seems to be stripping attachments, you might want to >>>>> upload the >>>>> pictures somewhere on the web and share the link. >>>>> >>>>> I tried adding a bogus new subnet to my existing 4.6 testbed and it worked >>>>> without problems, I could give instances IP from it. >>>>> >>>>> You might want to go through the management logs (don't forget to enable >>>>> DEBUG) >>>>> while you are trying to use the new IPs on the instance. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>> >>>>> Nux! >>>>> www.nux.ro >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 13:40:26 >>>>>> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue >>>>> >>>>>> First of all, thanks for the answer. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if >>>>>> this is a >>>>>> 4.6 issue or i did something wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see the attached screenshots. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. >>>>>> not. also >>>>>> the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but for >>>>>> VM TST3 >>>>>> not, no IP was allocated on VM. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Cristian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux! wrote: >>>>>> Cristian, >>>>>> >>>>>> In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well >>>>>> as >>>>>> 169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with >>>>>> the HV. >>>>>> - >>>>>> To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure >>>>>> - Zones >>>>>> - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - >>>>>> click >>>>>> existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually >>>>>> simpler >>>>>> from the API/cloudmonkey). >>>>>> >>>>>> Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, >>>>>> especially >>>>>> if you have exhausted your current subnet. >>>>>> You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>>> >>>>>> Nux! >>>>>> www.nux.ro >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu" >>>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23 >>>>>>> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM >>>>>>>host with >>>>>>> basic network ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I >>>>>>>have only 1 >>>>>>> NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 >>>>>>>etc.. guest IP >>>>>>> class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the >>>>>>>IP looks >>>>>>> like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on >>>>>>>the VM >>>>>>> side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can i get some help regarding this ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > > > Cristian
