Hi Lucian,

    I did what you told me, I also find something interesting on VR dnsmasq 
log, please see the screenshot and the syslog from this mail.

   You will see the VR show MAC address ignored for TEST3, i'm not sure why.

   Screenshots : http://imgur.com/a/HHYUr

   Syslog:

Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.084419] RPC: Registered named UNIX 
socket transport module.
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.084419] RPC: Registered udp transport 
module.
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.084419] RPC: Registered tcp transport 
module.
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.084419] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 
backchannel transport module.
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.111188] FS-Cache: Loaded
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.134041] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' 
registered for caching
Nov  9 11:20:03 systemvm kernel: [  187.163769] Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 
1996 o...@monad.swb.de).
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [  192.071255] Netfilter messages via NETLINK 
v0.30.
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [  192.079893] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 
(1959 buckets, 7836 max)
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: using user-space event 
filtering
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: netlink event socket buffer 
size has been set to 262142 bytes
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11427]: initialization completed
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm conntrack-tools[11432]: -- starting in daemon mode --
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm kernel: [  192.081523] ctnetlink v0.93: registering 
with nfnetlink.
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: started, version 2.62 cachesize 150
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt 
DBus i18n IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP conntrack
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: reading /etc/resolv.conf
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: using nameserver 8.8.4.4#53
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: using nameserver 8.8.8.8#53
Nov  9 11:20:08 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: read /etc/hosts - 4 addresses
Nov  9 11:20:09 systemvm kernel: [  193.428232] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 
Netfilter Core Team
Nov  9 11:20:09 systemvm kernel: [  193.447974] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006 
Netfilter Core Team
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11917]: setsockopt recvref[30]: Protocol not 
available
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11917]: This binary does not support kernel 
L2TP.
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: xl2tpd version xl2tpd-1.3.1 started on 
systemvm PID:11918
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Written by Mark Spencer, Copyright (C) 
1998, Adtran, Inc.
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Forked by Scott Balmos and David Stipp, 
(C) 2001
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Inherited by Jeff McAdams, (C) 2002
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Forked again by Xelerance 
(www.xelerance.com) (C) 2006
Nov  9 11:20:13 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: Listening on IP address 0.0.0.0, port 
1701
Nov  9 11:20:42 systemvm /usr/sbin/irqbalance: Balancing is ineffective on 
systems with a single cache domain.  Shutting down
Nov  9 11:20:59 systemvm KVP: KVP starting; pid is:18270
Nov  9 11:21:36 systemvm shutdown[21010]: shutting down for system halt
Nov  9 11:21:36 systemvm init: Switching to runlevel: 0
Nov  9 11:21:37 systemvm KVP: KVP starting; pid is:21036
Nov  9 11:21:37 systemvm KVP: recvfrom failed; pid:21036 error:2 No such file 
or directory
Nov  9 11:21:37 systemvm init: Re-reading inittab
Nov  9 11:21:37 systemvm conntrack-tools[11432]: ---- shutdown received ----
Nov  9 11:21:39 systemvm dnsmasq[11500]: exiting on receipt of SIGTERM
Nov  9 11:21:39 systemvm acpid: exiting
Nov  9 11:21:39 systemvm xl2tpd[11918]: death_handler: Fatal signal 15 received
Nov  9 11:21:39 systemvm ntpd[1732]: ntpd exiting on signal 15




Multumesc ! 


Regards,
Cristian

 
On 12/12/2015 1:38:43 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
Cristian,

So adding the IPs is not a problem, I see a few subnets added there.

I see TEST3 should have got an IP address ending in 165, but has not.
Can you check /var/log/messages (/var/log/syslog) on the VM and the VR, see if 
you see anything regarding DHCP, the VM's MAC address and so on.
Also, if you restart the network on the VM or simply run `dhclient eth0`, do 
you get an IP?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 21:23:12
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue

> I removed the URL and i did a re-upload of the screenshots because i forgot to
> hide some IP. ( also one of the server was compromised )
>
>
> NEW URL: http://imgur.com/a/0qmvx
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
> www.istream.today [http://www.istream.today/]
> www.shape.host [http://www.shape.host/]
> +40.733.955.922
> 
> On 12/11/2015 7:09:57 PM, Cristian Ciobanu wrote:
> Please see the screenshots from following URL: http://imgur.com/a/Fbbyi
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
> 
> On 12/11/2015 5:38:30 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Cristian,
>
> The mailing list seems to be stripping attachments, you might want to upload 
> the
> pictures somewhere on the web and share the link.
>
> I tried adding a bogus new subnet to my existing 4.6 testbed and it worked
> without problems, I could give instances IP from it.
>
> You might want to go through the management logs (don't forget to enable 
> DEBUG)
> while you are trying to use the new IPs on the instance.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 13:40:26
>> Subject: Re: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue
>
>> First of all, thanks for the answer.
>>
>> This is how i did, was work before on CloudStack 4.5 I'm not sure if this is 
>> a
>> 4.6 issue or i did something wrong.
>>
>> Please see the attached screenshots.
>>
>> If you see on VR.jpg the class starting with 149. works great but 158. not. 
>> also
>> the if you see the screenshot for VM TST2, everything is fine, but  for VM 
>> TST3
>> not, no IP was allocated on VM.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Cristian
>>
>> 
>> On 12/11/2015 3:07:34 PM, Nux! wrote:
>> Cristian,
>>
>> In a Basic Network you only have one public interface on the VR, as well as
>> 169.254 on eth1 - that's a link-local address used to communicate with the 
>> HV.
>> -
>> To add a new subnet to your network you must go to Home - Infrastructure - 
>> Zones
>> - Your Zone - Physical Network - Your Public Network - Guest - Network - 
>> click
>> existing network - View IP Ranges - Add IP Range ... (it's actually simpler
>> from the API/cloudmonkey).
>>
>> Once you have added it your VR should start using it at some point, 
>> especially
>> if you have exhausted your current subnet.
>> You can check what IP it passed out to instances in /etc/dhcphosts.txt
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Cristian Ciobanu"
>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 12:17:23
>>> Subject: Cloudstack VR 4.6 issue
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>    I try to find the issue regarding additional IP class.
>>>
>>>    I have a CloudStack 4.6 on CentOS 6.7 ( 1x MGMT server and one KVM host 
>>>with
>>>    basic network )
>>>
>>>    Everything works fine till i try to add a additional guest IP class the
>>>     additional is not working also i don't see any changes on VR and I have 
>>>only 1
>>>    NIC with GUEST traffic on the VR, does not matter if i add 1,2,3 etc.. 
>>>guest IP
>>>    class i don't see any updates on my VR also if i create a new VM the IP 
>>>looks
>>>    like is allocated in CloudStack web interface but no IP allocated on the 
>>>VM
>>>    side.
>>>
>>>    Can i get some help regarding this ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
> > > Cristian

Reply via email to