The problem is that for Xen1 and Xen2, the mgmt. interface is NIC4, while for 
Xen3, the mgmt. interface is Bond4+5.  According to docs, incoming server 
should not have any bond configurations, it will automatically get those from 
the pool once it becomes a pool member.

What you need to do is 1) wipe out all bond assignments on Xen3; 2) assign 
mgmt. IP to NIC4,  3) join Xen3 into the pool.  You can assign any storage IPs 
for Xen3 after it has joint the pool.

Yiping

PS:  if this is a brand new pool,  I would recommend that you rebuild the pool 
so that the mgmt. NIC is also a bond.

On 9/8/16, 8:43 AM, "Jeremy Peterson" <jpeter...@acentek.net> wrote:

    Ok so do I have to change my existing pool hosts to have a bond? Is that 
the issue ? 
    
    Jeremy
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net] 
    Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 10:41 AM
    To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: RE: Adding Hosts to XenCenter Pool
    
    I changed my "name" of the Box 4+5 to MGMT to match what my pool has and 
same thing error.
    
    Jeremy
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
    Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 10:03 AM
    To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: RE: Adding Hosts to XenCenter Pool
    
    Super XenServer related but GRRRR!!!!!
    http://screencast.com/t/2qpuXJaR9rhU
    
    Xen3 is the server I want to add to the pool of xen1 and xen2
    
    I see my Management is setup on all three IP's are reachable since my 
xencenter server can see everything for both groups of servers.  
    
    Only difference is Management is called MGMT as network label on my current 
pool and Bond 4+5 on the new hosts I want to add.
    
    http://screencast.com/t/sBiNU9XAtr
    
    That is the error I get when I try to join the pool.
    
    The server joining the pool must have a physical management NIC  (i.e. the 
management NIC must not be on a VLAN or bonded PIF)
    
    
    Jeremy
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Stephan Seitz [mailto:s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com]
    Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 5:17 AM
    To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Adding Hosts to XenCenter Pool
    
    Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2016, 22:57 +0000 schrieb Jeremy Peterson:
    > So I am running XenCenter and I am trying to create a second pool to 
    > add hosts to but when I join the pool the errors are coming up
    > 
    > The server joining the pool must have a physical management NIC  (i.e. 
    > the management NIC must not be on a VLAN or bonded PIF)
    
    Indeed, this is XenServer-specific.
    Start with one host meant to be the initial pool-master. Say: configure 
these trunks and networks on just this single host. Don't forget to label these 
networks to meet the respective ACS labels.
    If you'ld like add this host to ACS. Can be done now or later.
    Additional hosts meant as additional pool-members shouldn't be configured. 
Just do a simple installation and define the hosts management IP *on one of the 
meant-to-be MGMT trunk-ports*.
    Join the addtitional host to the pool-master and you're done. The pool- 
configuration will be populated to all new pool-members. I'ld recommend to use 
the identical NICs on every host - that's way easier.
    
    
    > I have 6 nics
    > 
    > 2 on board 1GB NIC ( LACP BOND with port channel to two different 
    > nexus 5k) MGMT
    > 2 10GB NIC ( LACP BOND with port channel to two different nexus 5k) 
    > Primary storage
    > 2 10GB NIC ( LACP BOND with port channel to two different nexus 5k) 
    > Sec Storage & Guest & Public traffic
    > 
    > Everything looks good outside of a xenserver pool the minute I want to 
    > add to a pool I get the above error.
    > 
    > I am on CS 4.5.0 XS 6.5
    > 
    > Maybe I should ask this to XenServer but I use CloudStack and I seen 
    > someone talk about XenServer MGMT LACP a couple weeks ago but I don't 
    > think I seen a good answer on if it works or not.
    > 
    > I'm confused why it doesn't work.
    
    
    

Reply via email to