Sorry I am using 4.5.0 I mistyped my versions.
http://prntscr.com/fmuluj
My router.template.xenserver shows
SystemVM Template (XenServer)
If I go Templates -> SystemVM Template (XenServer) the Status is Download
Complete and Read shows Yes
This is the command I ran on my mananagement server to redownload systemvm
template.
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
-m /secondary -u
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2 -h
xenserver -F
i-153-446-VM was a working VM that powered off during this whole set of
problems and had not been able to power back online since. The oddity is I get
the error visually "insufficient capacity" yes during the call to start that VM
it finds a valid host for Memory and CPU but then errors with UUID is invalid.
I am more focused on SSVM and ConsoleProxyVM not starting at this time. As I
have replaced i-153-446 with a new VM. Now this is puzzling. I can launch new
VM's for ISO's and templates.
Display name test-launch-from-template
Name test-launch-from-template
State Running
Template CentOS 7 40GB
Dynamically Scalable Yes
OS Type CentOS 7
Hypervisor XenServer
Attached ISO
Compute offering 2vCPU,4GB RAM,HA
# of CPU Cores 2
CPU (in MHz) 2000
Memory (in MB) 4096
VGPU
HA Enabled Yes
Group
Zone name Rushford
Host Flex-Xen4.flexhost.local
Domain ROOT
Account admin
Created 22 Jun 2017 08:33:30
I suspected storage a while back and noticed that the SSVM was recreating its
2.5GB disk over and over and over on all of my storage luns. So after cleaning
up the 5TB worth of data (last Friday) I don't see a storage issue with my SAN
iscsi connections.
http://prntscr.com/fmus2i
Again thanks Dag for your response here's to hoping some of that helps track
down what's broke.
Whats killing me is the amount of logs. It seems like its creating multiple
system vm's at the same time
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Dag Sonstebo [mailto:dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 6:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
OK, you seem to have a handful of issues here.
1) You have stated at the start of this thread you are using CloudStack 4.9.0
and XS6.5.
In this log dump - https://pastebin.com/2DhzFVDZ - all your downloads are for
4.5 system VM templates, e.g.
2017-06-21 10:46:16,440 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-39:ctx-ca13c13b job-1042/job-147411 ctx-ebfa1fb6) Seq
15-7914231920173516250: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via:
15(Flex-Xen3.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid";
…
Your MySQL query confirms this:
- - -
SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';
1 routing-1 SystemVM Template (XenServer)
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241 SystemVM Template (XenServer) 0
0 184 1 0 1 0 XenServer
0 2689602048 Active 0 0
3 routing-3 SystemVM Template (KVM)
8a46062a-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002 SystemVM Template (KVM) 0 0
15 1 0 1 0 KVM 0
Active 0 0
8 routing-8 SystemVM Template (vSphere)
8a4e70c6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-vmware.ova
OVA 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
3106a79a4ce66cd7f6a7c50e93f2db57 SystemVM Template (vSphere) 0
0 15 1 0 1 0 VMware 0
Active 0 1
9 routing-9 SystemVM Template (HyperV)
8a5184e6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-hyperv.vhd.zip
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
70bd30ea02ee9ed67d2c6b85c179cee9 SystemVM Template (HyperV) 0
0 15 1 0 1 0 Hyperv 0
Active 0 0
10 routing-10 SystemVM Template (LXC)
5bb9e71c-bb72-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2 2015-02-23 09:40:56 1
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002 SystemVM Template (LXC) 0 0
15 1 0 1 0 LXC 0
Active 0 0
- - -
In addition you have also stated “I redeployed
systemcl64template-5.6-xen.vhd.bz2 last week does that not recreated the uuid
?”
So the questions here are:
- why are you using 4.5 templates with 4.9? Did you recently upgrade or was
this put in wrong to start off with?
- what are you trying to do with “systemcl64template-5.6-xen.vhd.bz2”? My guess
is this is a typo? If you were trying to install the 4.6 template what process
did you follow?
- following on from this can you do a MySQL query listing the uploaded
template? Can you also check what the status is of this in your GUI – is it
uploaded to the zone in question and in a READY state? You can also check this
in the template_store_ref table.
- what is your global setting for “router.template.xenserver” currently set to?
I get the impression your environment is possibly managing to limp along using
4.5 system VM templates – if so I’m surprised if anything is working. For 4.9
you should be using 4.6 templates (e.g.
http://packages.shapeblue.com.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/systemvmtemplate/4.6/new/systemvm64template-4.6-xen.vhd.bz2
) - although I think maybe this is what you are trying to achieve?
2) VM i-153-446 – as you can see from the logs there’s not a log to go by:
"Unable to start i-153-446-VM due to ". However – you haven’t told us if this
is a new VM or existing? If it’s new it won’t necessarily be able to start
until you have the SSVM sorted in your Rushford zone. For further
troubleshooting you should also check the logs on the XS host where this VM was
trying to start.
3) Your issues could be storage related – do all SRs (like FlexSAN2-LUN0) show
as connected to your XS hosts in XenCenter? If not can you repair them from
XenCenter?
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 21/06/2017, 19:39, "Jeremy Peterson" <jpeter...@acentek.net> wrote:
And combing through the logs I see that one of my VM's is trying to launch
i-153-446 its passed all the cpu and memory checks and found primary storage
but then when it goes to deploy. I am getting a catch exception insufficient
storage.
2017-06-21 13:10:19,219 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-252:ctx-717133c7) The VM is in stopped state, detected problem
during startup : i-153-446-VM
2017-06-21 13:10:19,219 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-252:ctx-717133c7) Seq 19-2522578741280901601: Response Received:
2017-06-21 13:10:19,219 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(DirectAgent-252:ctx-717133c7) Seq 19-2522578741280901601: Processing: { Ans:
, MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 19, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":446,"name":"i-153-446-VM","bootloader":"PyGrub","type":"User","cpus":4,"minSpeed":500,"maxSpeed":2000,"minRam":3221225472,"maxRam":12884901888,"arch":"x86_64","os":"Windows
Server 2012 R2 (64-bit)","platformEmulator":"Windows Server 2012 R2
(64-bit)","bootArgs":"","enableHA":true,"limitCpuUse":false,"enableDynamicallyScaleVm":false,"vncPassword":"a9QSgiSW/+6iG3aaGfgaJw==","params":{"memoryOvercommitRatio":"4","platform":"viridian:true;acpi:1;apic:true;viridian_reference_tsc:true;viridian_time_ref_count:true;pae:true;videoram:8;device_id:0002;nx:true;vga:std","Message.ReservedCapacityFreed.Flag":"true","cpuOvercommitRatio":"4","hypervisortoolsversion":"xenserver61"},"uuid":"896c1d67-3f1d-4f0b-bd2c-1548cd637faf","disks":[{"data":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"69eba19d-6f5d-4f5b-94eb-69cf467ab25e","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"ROOT-446","size":85899345920,"path":"8a64ab1c-3528-4b8a-bb9a-ef164c7f6385","volumeId":537,"vmName":"i-153-446-VM","accountId":153,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":537,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"diskSeq":0,"path":"8a64ab1c-3528-4b8a-bb9a-ef164c7f6385","type":"ROOT","_details":{"managed":"false","storagePort":"0","storageHost":"localhost","volumeSize":"85899345920"}},{"data":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"id":0,"format":"ISO","accountId":0,"hvm":false}},"diskSeq":3,"type":"ISO"}],"nics":[{"deviceId":0,"networkRateMbps":1000,"defaultNic":true,"pxeDisable":false,"nicUuid":"8ecdff5f-2e67-406c-8145-71a437b35ccb","uuid":"d6010ef5-ae7e-4b5a-a8fe-b33d701742dd","ip":"192.168.211.211","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"192.168.211.1","mac":"02:00:20:1c:00:05","dns1":"208.74.240.5","dns2":"208.74.247.245","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Guest","broadcastUri":"vlan://1611","isolationUri":"vlan://1611","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false,"name":"GUEST-PUB"}],"vcpuMaxLimit":16},"_iqnToPath":{},"result":false,"details":"Unable
to start i-153-446-VM due to ","wait":0}}] }
2017-06-21 13:10:19,219 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Seq
19-2522578741280901601: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 19, Ver:
v1, Flags: 10, { StartAnswer } }
2017-06-21 13:10:19,230 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Unable
to start VM on Host[-19-Routing] due to Unable to start i-153-446-VM due to
2017-06-21 13:10:19,237 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-95:ctx-0d080cef job-1042/job-148142) Done executing
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for job-148142
2017-06-21 13:10:19,240 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.SyncQueueManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-95:ctx-0d080cef job-1042/job-148142) Sync queue (128149) is
currently empty
2017-06-21 13:10:19,240 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
(Work-Job-Executor-95:ctx-0d080cef job-1042/job-148142) Remove job-148142 from
job monitoring
2017-06-21 13:10:19,245 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
Cleaning up resources for the vm VM[User|i-153-446-VM] in Starting state
2017-06-21 13:10:19,246 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Seq
19-2522578741280901602: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via:
19(Flex-Xen1.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"i-153-446-VM","wait":0}}]
}
2017-06-21 13:10:19,247 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Seq
19-2522578741280901602: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via:
19(Flex-Xen1.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"checkBeforeCleanup":false,"vmName":"i-153-446-VM","wait":0}}]
}
2017-06-21 13:10:19,247 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-82:ctx-9ee1039e) Seq 19-2522578741280901602: Executing request
2017-06-21 13:10:19,250 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-82:ctx-9ee1039e) Seq 19-2522578741280901602: Response Received:
2017-06-21 13:10:19,250 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(DirectAgent-82:ctx-9ee1039e) Seq 19-2522578741280901602: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 19, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopAnswer":{"result":true,"details":"VM does not
exist","wait":0}}] }
2017-06-21 13:10:19,250 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Seq
19-2522578741280901602: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 19, Ver:
v1, Flags: 10, { StopAnswer } }
2017-06-21 13:10:19,254 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=298
2017-06-21 13:10:19,256 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
Changing active number of nics for network id=298 on -1
2017-06-21 13:10:19,257 WARN [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7) Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-22605-VM]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:941)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4471)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor246.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4627)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:536)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:493)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2017-06-21 13:10:19,259 INFO [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7) Unable to start secondary storage vm for standby
capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 22605, will recycle it and start a new one
2017-06-21 13:10:19,259 DEBUG [c.c.a.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter]
(secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7) received secondary storage vm alert
2017-06-21 13:10:19,259 DEBUG [c.c.a.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter]
(secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7) Secondary Storage Vm creation failure, zone:
Rushford
2017-06-21 13:10:19,260 WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7)
alertType:: 19 // dataCenterId:: 1 // podId:: null // clusterId:: null //
message:: Secondary Storage Vm creation failure. zone: Rushford, error details:
null
2017-06-21 13:10:19,267 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Asking
VpcVirtualRouter to release
NicProfile[1052-446-987e8cca-ec26-46cd-aec2-a1f4b2283dff-192.168.211.211-null
2017-06-21 13:10:19,267 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
Successfully released network resources for the vm VM[User|i-153-446-VM]
2017-06-21 13:10:19,267 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
Successfully cleanued up resources for the vm VM[User|i-153-446-VM] in Starting
state
2017-06-21 13:10:19,269 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Root
volume is ready, need to place VM in volume's cluster
2017-06-21 13:10:19,274 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Deploy
avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [19]
2017-06-21 13:10:19,274 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
com.cloud.deploy.UserDispersingPlanner@4cafa203
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Trying
to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:1,cluster:1, requested cpu:
8000, requested ram: 12884901888
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Is ROOT
volume READY (pool already allocated)?: Yes
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
DeploymentPlan has host_id specified, choosing this host and making no checks
on this host: 19
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 INFO [o.a.c.s.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-b13acfc7) Primary secondary storage is not even started, wait
until next turn
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 ERROR [c.c.a.AlertManagerImpl]
(Email-Alerts-Sender-25:null) Failed to send email alert
javax.mail.MessagingException: Could not connect to SMTP host:
spam.acentek.net, port: 465 (java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused)
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) The
specified host is in avoid set
2017-06-21 13:10:19,276 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Cannnot
deploy to specified host, returning.
2017-06-21 13:10:19,297 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) VM
state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's
original host id: 1 new host id: null host id before state transition: 19
2017-06-21 13:10:19,300 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Hosts's
actual total CPU: 48000 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 192000
2017-06-21 13:10:19,300 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Hosts's
actual total RAM: 128790209280 and RAM after applying overprovisioning:
515160834048
2017-06-21 13:10:19,300 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) release
cpu from host: 19, old used: 24000,reserved: 0, actual total: 48000, total with
overprovisioning: 192000; new used: 16000,reserved:0; movedfromreserved:
false,moveToReserveredfalse
2017-06-21 13:10:19,300 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) release
mem from host: 19, old used: 38654705664,reserved: 0, total: 515160834048; new
used: 25769803776,reserved:0; movedfromreserved: false,moveToReserveredfalse
2017-06-21 13:10:19,332 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f)
Invocation exception, caused by:
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User|i-153-446-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
id=1
2017-06-21 13:10:19,332 INFO [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145 ctx-f018393f) Rethrow
exception com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
create a deployment for VM[User|i-153-446-VM]Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2017-06-21 13:10:19,332 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145) Done with run of VM
work job: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for VM 446, job origin: 148144
2017-06-21 13:10:19,332 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-100:ctx-e1276898 job-148144/job-148145) Unable to complete
AsyncJobVO {id:148145, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null, instanceId:
null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAABvnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAAAAAAAAAXBzcgAOamF2YS5sYW5nLkxvbmc7i-SQzI8j3wIAAUoABXZhbHVleHIAEGphdmEubGFuZy5OdW1iZXKGrJUdC5TgiwIAAHhwAAAAAAAAAAFzcQB-AAgAAAAAAAAAE3BwcHEAfgAKcHNyABFqYXZhLnV0aWwuSGFzaE1hcAUH2sHDFmDRAwACRgAKbG9hZEZhY3RvckkACXRocmVzaG9sZHhwP0AAAAAAAAx3CAAAABAAAAABdAAKVm1QYXNzd29yZHQAHHJPMEFCWFFBRG5OaGRtVmtYM0JoYzNOM2IzSmt4cA,
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 345050411715, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: Wed Jun 21 13:10:16 CDT 2017}, job origin:148144
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM[User|i-153-446-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
id=1
My logs are just rolling with these errors.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:10 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Why is my DEBUG show uuid of 8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 but below
in my catch exception it shows uuid ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf.
See below.
2017-06-21 10:46:16,431 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-45:ctx-7cdfe536 job-342/job-147412 ctx-39b2bc63) Seq
1-6981705322331112844:
Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via: 1(Flex-Xen2.flexhost.local),
Ver: v1,
Flags: 100111,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":
{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2";,
"uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662","id":1,"format":"VHD","accountId":1,"checksum":"2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241","hvm":false,
"displayText":"SystemVM Template
(XenServer)","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0",
"id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},
"name":"routing-1","hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{
"uuid":"a2456229-2942-4d9b-9bff-c6d9ea004fbd","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{
"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":
"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"ROOT-22411","size":2689602048,"volumeId":27330,"vmName":
"v-22411-VM","accountId":1,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":27330,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"executeInSequence":true,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
}
2017-06-21 10:46:16,431 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-45:ctx-7cdfe536 job-342/job-147412 ctx-39b2bc63) Seq
1-6981705322331112844:
2017-06-21 10:46:16,444 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-385c99e9) Unable to create volume;
Pool=volumeTO[uuid=a2456229-2942-4d9b-9bff-c6d9ea004fbd|path=null|datastore=PrimaryDataStoreTO[uuid=FlexSAN2-LUN0|name=null|id=5|pooltype=PreSetup]];
Disk:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Catch Exception
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$UuidInvalid :VDI getByUuid for
uuid: ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf failed due to The uuid you
supplied was invalid.
Now if I check the DB to find out what my templates uuid should be.
SELECT * FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';
1 routing-1 SystemVM Template (XenServer)
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241 SystemVM Template (XenServer) 0
0 184 1 0 1 0 XenServer
0 2689602048 Active 0 0
3 routing-3 SystemVM Template (KVM)
8a46062a-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002 SystemVM Template (KVM) 0 0
15 1 0 1 0 KVM 0
Active 0 0
8 routing-8 SystemVM Template (vSphere)
8a4e70c6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-vmware.ova
OVA 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
3106a79a4ce66cd7f6a7c50e93f2db57 SystemVM Template (vSphere) 0
0 15 1 0 1 0 VMware 0
Active 0 1
9 routing-9 SystemVM Template (HyperV)
8a5184e6-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-hyperv.vhd.zip
VHD 2015-02-23 09:35:05 1
70bd30ea02ee9ed67d2c6b85c179cee9 SystemVM Template (HyperV) 0
0 15 1 0 1 0 Hyperv 0
Active 0 0
10 routing-10 SystemVM Template (LXC)
5bb9e71c-bb72-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 0 0 SYSTEM 0 64
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-kvm.qcow2.bz2
QCOW2 2015-02-23 09:40:56 1
aa9f501fecd3de1daeb9e2f357f6f002 SystemVM Template (LXC) 0 0
15 1 0 1 0 LXC 0
Active 0 0
Ok so that shows me my system templates UUID is
8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662 and that lines up correctly with my debug
command uuid 8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662.
Suggestions ? Ideas? Thoughts?
Thank you.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:58 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
You are correct I had 2 hosts disabled when I tried to launch that VM. But
my hosts all show state Up.
Heres Flex-Xen1.flexhost.local
http://prntscr.com/fmi0tw
Heres the info page of the host
http://prntscr.com/fmi16g
Resource state: Enabled
State up: Up
I did a force reconnect on all hosts and that cleared the avoid set error.
But now I am getting UUID invalid when trying to launch a VM. This is
whats happening to the system VM's.
https://pastebin.com/2DhzFVDZ
You see it errors : The uuid you supplied was invalid.
Now I see the above command declared the host and storage but the UUID is
"uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662"
How can I see what that ties to ?
I redeployed systemcl64template-5.6-xen.vhd.bz2 last week does that not
recreated the uuid ?
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Dag Sonstebo [mailto:dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:12 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
Hi Jeremy,
You have 6 hosts: “List of hosts in ascending order of number of VMs: [15,
17, 19, 1, 16, 18]” – my guess is you have disabled hosts 16+18 for their
reboot.
You immediately have the rest of the hosts in an avoid set: “Deploy avoids
pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [17, 1, 19, 15]”.
So you need to work out why those hosts are considered non-valid. Do they
show up as live in your CloudStack GUI? Are they all enabled as well as out of
maintenance mode?
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 21/06/2017, 15:13, "Jeremy Peterson" <jpeter...@acentek.net> wrote:
So this morning I reconnected all hosts.
I also disabled my two hosts that need to reboot and powered on a VM
and now I am getting a Insufficient Resources.
Whats odd is that Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts?
2017-06-21 08:43:53,695 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Root
volume is ready, need to place VM in volume's cluster
2017-06-21 08:43:53,695 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348)
Vol[537|vm=446|ROOT] is READY, changing deployment plan to use this pool's
dcId: 1 , podId: 1 , and clusterId: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,702 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Deploy
avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [17, 1, 19, 15]
2017-06-21 08:43:53,703 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348)
DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
com.cloud.deploy.UserDispersingPlanner@4cafa203
2017-06-21 08:43:53,703 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Trying
to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:1,cluster:1, requested cpu:
8000, requested ram: 12884901888
2017-06-21 08:43:53,703 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Is ROOT
volume READY (pool already allocated)?: Yes
2017-06-21 08:43:53,703 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) This VM
has last host_id specified, trying to choose the same host: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,704 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) The last
host of this VM is in avoid set
2017-06-21 08:43:53,704 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Cannot
choose the last host to deploy this VM
2017-06-21 08:43:53,704 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348)
Searching resources only under specified Cluster: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,714 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Checking
resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,714 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,718 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) List of hosts in ascending order of number of VMs:
[15, 17, 19, 1, 16, 18]
2017-06-21 08:43:53,718 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 4 hosts to check for
allocation: [Host[-15-Routing], Host[-17-Routing], Host[-19-Routing],
Host[-1-Routing]]
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 4 hosts for allocation after prioritization:
[Host[-15-Routing], Host[-17-Routing], Host[-19-Routing], Host[-1-Routing]]
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=8000Mhz, Ram=12288
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: Flex-Xen3.flexhost.local, hostId: 15 is in
avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: Flex-Xen4.flexhost.local, hostId: 17 is in
avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: Flex-Xen1.flexhost.local, hostId: 19 is in
avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: Flex-Xen2.flexhost.local, hostId: 1 is in
avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348
FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) No
suitable hosts found
2017-06-21 08:43:53,727 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) No
suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,728 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Could
not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters,
returning.
2017-06-21 08:43:53,728 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348)
Searching resources only under specified Cluster: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,729 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) The
specified cluster is in avoid set, returning.
2017-06-21 08:43:53,736 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Deploy
avoids pods: [], clusters: [1], hosts: [17, 1, 19, 15]
2017-06-21 08:43:53,737 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348)
DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm:
com.cloud.deploy.UserDispersingPlanner@4cafa203
2017-06-21 08:43:53,737 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Trying
to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:1,cluster:null, requested
cpu: 8000, requested ram: 12884901888
2017-06-21 08:43:53,737 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) Is ROOT
volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
2017-06-21 08:43:53,737 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) This VM
has last host_id specified, trying to choose the same host: 1
2017-06-21 08:43:53,739 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-71:ctx-f01a90b9 job-146764/job-146768 ctx-66c78348) The last
host of this VM is in avoid set
All oddities.
So I did a force reconnect on all 6 hosts and enabled the two hosts
that were pending updates.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:33 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Ok so my issues have not gone away.
I have two hosts that have not rebooted yet tonight I will be
maintenancing those hosts out and migrating vm's away from those hosts and then
performing a reboot of the host and installing a couple xenserver updates.
One thing is I am not getting the CANNOT ATTACH NETWORK error anymore
which is cool but.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5IXhrpPAT9qQ0FFUmRyRjN4NlE
Take a look at creation of VM 20685
2017-06-20 12:15:48,083 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Found a
potential host id: 1 name: Flex-Xen2.flexhost.local and associated storage
pools for this VM
2017-06-20 12:15:48,084 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Returning
Deployment Destination:
Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id))]
: Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(1)-Host(1)-Storage(Volume(25604|ROOT-->Pool(5))]
2017-06-20 12:15:48,084 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Deployment
found - P0=VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-20685-VM],
P0=Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-->Pool(Id))]
: Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(1)-Host(1)-Storage(Volume(25604|ROOT-->Pool(5))]
So it found a host and storage pool
Networks were already created on line 482-484
But then look it fails on create volume UUID is invalid???
2017-06-20 12:15:48,262 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) VM is being
created in podId: 1
2017-06-20 12:15:48,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) Network
id=200 is already implemented
2017-06-20 12:15:48,269 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.PodBasedNetworkGuru]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Allocated
a nic
NicProfile[81905-20685-0493941d-d193-4325-84bc-d325a8900332-10.90.2.207-null
for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-20685-VM]
2017-06-20 12:15:48,280 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Network
id=203 is already implemented
2017-06-20 12:15:48,290 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) Network
id=202 is already implemented
2017-06-20 12:15:48,316 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.StorageNetworkGuru]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Allocated
a storage nic
NicProfile[81906-20685-0493941d-d193-4325-84bc-d325a8900332-10.83.2.205-null
for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-20685-VM]
2017-06-20 12:15:48,336 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Checking
if we need to prepare 1 volumes for VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-20685-VM]
2017-06-20 12:15:48,342 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) template 1
is already in store:5, type:Image
2017-06-20 12:15:48,344 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) template 1
is already in store:5, type:Primary
2017-06-20 12:15:48,346 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) Network
id=201 is already implemented
2017-06-20 12:15:48,372 DEBUG [c.c.d.d.DataCenterIpAddressDaoImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) Releasing
ip address for instance=49817
2017-06-20 12:15:48,381 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) copyAsync
inspecting src type TEMPLATE copyAsync inspecting dest type VOLUME
2017-06-20 12:15:48,386 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Seq
16-3622864425242874354: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via:
16(Flex-Xen6.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662","id":1,"format":"VHD","accountId":1,"checksum":"2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241","hvm":false,"displayText":"SystemVM
Template
(XenServer)","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"routing-1","hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"4dba9def-2657-430e-8cd8-9369aebcaa25","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"ROOT-20685","size":2689602048,"volumeId":25604,"vmName":"s-20685-VM","accountId":1,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":25604,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"executeInSequence":true,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
}
2017-06-20 12:15:48,386 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-82:ctx-c39fa1f8 job-1042/job-138603 ctx-c17ce6fc) Seq
16-3622864425242874354: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050411715, via:
16(Flex-Xen6.flexhost.local), Ver: v1, Flags: 100111,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf","origUrl":"http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2","uuid":"8a4039f2-bb71-11e4-8c76-0050569b1662","id":1,"format":"VHD","accountId":1,"checksum":"2b15ab4401c2d655264732d3fc600241","hvm":false,"displayText":"SystemVM
Template
(XenServer)","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"routing-1","hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"4dba9def-2657-430e-8cd8-9369aebcaa25","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"FlexSAN2-LUN0","id":5,"poolType":"PreSetup","host":"localhost","path":"/FlexSAN2-LUN0","port":0,"url":"PreSetup://localhost/FlexSAN2-LUN0/?ROLE=Primary&STOREUUID=FlexSAN2-LUN0"}},"name":"ROOT-20685","size":2689602048,"volumeId":25604,"vmName":"s-20685-VM","accountId":1,"format":"VHD","provisioningType":"THIN","id":25604,"deviceId":0,"hypervisorType":"XenServer"}},"executeInSequence":true,"options":{},"wait":0}}]
}
2017-06-20 12:15:48,386 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-74:ctx-0acdd419) Seq 16-3622864425242874354: Executing request
2017-06-20 12:15:48,387 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.PodBasedNetworkGuru]
(Work-Job-Executor-88:ctx-c51dafa0 job-342/job-138604 ctx-75edebb0) Allocated a
nic
NicProfile[49817-12662-629b85e7-ce19-4568-9df7-143c76d24300-10.90.2.204-null
for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-12662-VM]
So how do I check UUID's to validate that they are correct ?
2017-06-20 12:15:48,391 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
(DirectAgent-74:ctx-0acdd419) Catch Exception
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$UuidInvalid :VDI getByUuid for uuid:
ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf failed due to The uuid you supplied was
invalid.
2017-06-20 12:15:48,391 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
(DirectAgent-74:ctx-0acdd419) Unable to create volume;
Pool=volumeTO[uuid=4dba9def-2657-430e-8cd8-9369aebcaa25|path=null|datastore=PrimaryDataStoreTO[uuid=FlexSAN2-LUN0|name=null|id=5|pooltype=PreSetup]];
Disk:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Catch Exception
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$UuidInvalid :VDI getByUuid for uuid:
ab6f3bcd-4c3e-4a7a-9f8b-45a822dbaaaf failed due to The uuid you supplied was
invalid.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:20 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
What type of networking are you using on the XenServers?
XenServers are connected with 6 nic's per host connected to
separate nexus 5k switches
NIC 0 and NIC 1 are Bond 0+1 10Gb nics
NIC 2 and NIC 3 are Bond 2+3 10Gb nics
NIC 4 and NIC 5 are Bond 4+5 2Gb nics
Cloudstack is running Advanced networking
Bond 0+1 is primary storage
Bond 2+3 is secondary storage
Bond 4+5 is Management
What version of os does the ms run on?
CentOS release 6.9 (Final)
What are the systemvm templates defined in your env?
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2
What is the version of the systemvm.iso?
Successfully installed system VM template to
/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/
I just reinstalled systemvm's from the above 4.5-xen.vhd What
is the capacity you have in your (test) environment?
This is a production enviroment and currently cloudstack shows
the following.
Public IP Addresses 61%
VLAN 35%
Management IP Addresses 20%
Primary Storage 44%
CPU 21%
Memory 5%
Of cource Secondary Storage shows 0%
What is the host os version for the hypervisors?
XenServer 6.5 SP1
What is the management network range?
management.network.cidr 10.90.1.0/24
What are the other physical networks?
?? Not sure what more you need
What storage do you use?
Primary - ISCSI
Secondary - NFS
Is it reachable from the systemvm?
All of my CS management servers have internet access Is the big
bad internet reachable for your SSVM’s public interface?
My SSVM does not go online but yes the public network is the
same as the VR public vlan and all instances behind VR's are connected to the
internet at this time
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:34 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH
<s.brues...@proio.com>
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
Your problem might be like what Swen says, Jeremy but also a wrong
systemvm offering or a fault in your management network definition.
I am going to sum up some trivialities so bear with me;
What type of networking are you using on the XenServers?
What version of os does the ms run on?
What are the systemvm templates defined in your env?
What is the version of the systemvm.iso?
What is the capacity you have in your (test) environment?
What is the host os version for the hypervisors?
What is the management network range?
What are the other physical networks?
What storage do you use?
Is it reachable from the systemvm?
Is the big bad internet reachable for your SSVM’s public interface?
And of course,
How is the weather, where you are at?
I am not sure any of these question is going to lead you in the right
direction but one of them should.
On 15/06/17 13:56, "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" <s.brues...@proio.com>
wrote:
I once did have some similar problem with my systemvms and my root
cause was that in the global settings it referred to the wrong systemvm
template. I am not sure if this helps you, but wanted to tell you.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
Swen
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017 01:55
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Hahaha. The best response ever.
I dug through these emails and someone had soft of the same log
messages cannot attach network and blamed xenserver. Ok I'm cool with that but
why oh why is it only system vms?
Jeremy
________________________________________
From: Imran Ahmed [im...@eaxiom.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:22 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Yes,
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:59 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Is there anyone out there reading these messages?
Am I just not seeing responses?
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:12 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I opened an issue since this is still an issue. CLOUDSTACK-9960
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 9:10 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
Any other suggestions?
I am going to be scheduling to run XenServer updates. But this all
points back to CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORk.
I've verified nothing is active on the Public IP space that those
two VM's were living on.
Jeremy
________________________________________
From: Jeremy Peterson <jpeter...@acentek.net>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:58 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I see the vm's try to create on a host that I just removed from
maintenance mode to install updates and here are the logs
I don't see anything that sticks out to me as a failure message.
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ip', 'route', 'del',
'169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12',
'169.254.0.1', 'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ip', 'route', 'add',
'169.254.0.0/16', 'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ip', 'route', 'del',
'169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12',
'169.254.0.1', 'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ip', 'route', 'add',
'169.254.0.0/16', 'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.multi: {'vgName':
'VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2', 'lvName1':
'VHD-633338a7-6c40-4aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d', 'action1':
'deactivateNoRefcount', 'action2': 'cleanupLock', 'uuid2':
'633338a7-6c40-4aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d', 'ns2':
'lvm-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2'}
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache created for
VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.action 1:
deactivateNoRefcount Jun
9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache: will initialize now Jun 9
09:54:00
Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache: refreshing Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM:
[13115] ['/usr/sbin/lvs', '--noheadings', '--units', 'b', '-o', '+lv_tags',
'/dev/VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] ['/usr/sbin/lvchange', '-an',
'/dev/VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2/VHD-633338a7-6c40-4
aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] ['/sbin/dmsetup', 'status',
'VG_XenStorage--469b6dcd--8466--3d03--de0e--cc3983e1b6e2-VHD--633338a7--6c40
--4aa6--b88e--c798b6fdc04d']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.action 2: cleanupLock
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ip', 'route', 'del',
'169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12',
'169.254.0.1', 'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ip', 'route', 'add',
'169.254.0.0/16', 'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:19 Xen3 updatempppathd: [15446] The garbage collection
routine
returned: 0 Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ip', 'route', 'del',
'169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12',
'169.254.0.1', 'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ip', 'route', 'add',
'169.254.0.0/16', 'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:53 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I am checking SMlog now on all hosts.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:00 AM
To: Users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
on xenserver log, did you check what is causing "
HOST_CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORK"?
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Peterson
<jpeter...@acentek.net>
wrote:
> 08:28:43 select * from vm_instance where name like 's-%'
limit
> 10000 7481 row(s) returned 0.000 sec / 0.032 sec
>
> All vm's 'state' returned Destoryed outside of the current vm
7873
> which is in a Stopped state but that goes Destroyed and a new get
created.
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 12:47 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
>
> I'll make that change in the am.
>
> Today I put a host in maintence and rebooted because proxy and
> secstore vm were constantly being created on that host and still
no
change.
>
> Let you know tomorrow.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> Date: 6/8/17 12:07 AM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
>
> Did you check SMLog on xenserver?
> unable to destroy task(com.xensource.xenapi.Task@256829a8) on
> host(b34f086e-fabf-471e-9feb-8f54362d7d0f) due to You gave an
invalid
> object reference. The object may have recently been deleted.
The
> class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the handle
> parameter echoes the bad value given.
>
> Looks like Destroy of SSVM failed. What state is SSVM in? mark it
as
> Destroyed in cloud DB and wait for cloudstack to create a new
SSVM.
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Jeremy Peterson
> <jpeter...@acentek.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Probably agreed.
> >
> > But I ran toolstack restart on all hypervisors and v-3193 just
tried
> > to create and fail along with s-5398.
> >
> > The PIF error went away. But VM's are still recreating
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/4n4xBgMT
> >
> > New log from this afternoon.
> >
> > My catalina.out is over 4GB
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Makrand [mailto:makrandsa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 12:52 AM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Looks more like hypervisor issue.
> >
> > Just run *xe-toolstack-restart* on hosts where these VMs are
trying
> > to start or if you don't have too many hosts, better run on all
> > members including master. most of i/o related issues squared
off by
> > toolstack bounce.
> >
> > --
> > Makrand
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Jeremy Peterson
> > <jpeter...@acentek.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok so I pulled this from Sunday morning.
> > >
> > > https://pastebin.com/nCETw1sC
> > >
> > >
> > > errorInfo: [HOST_CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORK,
> > > OpaqueRef:65d0c844-bd70-81e9-4518-8809e1dc0ee7,
> > > OpaqueRef:0093ac3f-9f3a-37e1-9cdb-581398d27ba2]
> > >
> > > XenServer error.
> > >
> > > Now this still gets me because all of the other VM's launched
just
> fine.
> > >
> > > Going into XenCenter I see an error at the bottom This PIF is
a
> > > bond slave and cannot be plugged.
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > > If I go to networking on the hosts I see the storage vlans
and
> > > bonds are all there.
> > >
> > > I see my GUEST-PUB bond is there and LACP is setup correct.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:23 AM
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
> > >
> > > Thank you all for those responses.
> > >
> > > I'll comb through my management-server.log and post a
pastebin if
> > > I'm scratching my head.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 6:53 AM
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
> > >
> > > If the zone is enabled, cloudstack should recreate them
automatically.
> > >
> > > ~ Rajani
> > >
> > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> > >
> > > On June 6, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Erik Weber (terbol...@gmail.com)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > CloudStack should recreate automatically, check the mgmt
server
> > > logs for hints of why it doesn't happen.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> > >
> > > tir. 6. jun. 2017 kl. 04.29 skrev Jeremy Peterson
> > > <jpeter...@acentek.net>:
> > >
> > > I had an issue Sunday morning with cloudstack 4.9.0 and
xenserver
> 6.5.0.
> > > My hosts stop sending LACP PDU's and caused a network drop to
> > > iSCSI primary storage.
> > >
> > > So all my instances recovered via HA enabled.
> > >
> > > But my console proxy and secondary storage system VM's got
stuck
> > > in a boot state that would not power on.
> > >
> > > At this time they are expunged and gone.
> > >
> > > How do I tell cloudstack-management to recreate system VM's?
> > >
> > > I'm drawing a blank since deploying CS two years ago and just
> > > keeping things running and adding hosts and more storage
> > > everything has been so stable.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> >
>
- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail
sind nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail
in error) please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
