Hi all, After banging my head with different network configuration permutations, I don't understand what is the issue with Network Guru here and why it can't implement the isolated guest network. I just want to know if Advanced Zone can be successfully setup or has someone configured an advanced zone using untagged VLAN traffic?
I have the following configuration of components: - I have 3 (16 GB Ram and 4 Cores) machines each with 1 physical NIC. - I have two networks: 192.168.20.0/24 (using this for isolated guest network) and 172.16.20.0/16 (management server and NFS servers network) - I am using KVM hypervisor and NFS for storage. - Currently, the output of brctl show is (when the Cloudstack is not running, other wise the interface are populated with three vnets for cloud0 and 4-5 vnets for cloudbr0): bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces cloud0 8000.000000000000 no cloudbr0 8000.3464a92a083a no eno1 virbr0 8000.525400daae23 yes virbr0-nic My earlier doubt was if I can configure advanced zone with one physical interface available in each host, but that was resolved when I read this post of ShankerBalan: https://shankerbalan.net/blog/cloudstack-simple-advanced-network-example/ ACS throws InsufficientVirtualNetworkCapacity exception and lines like: "NetworkGuru can't implement network [275||15]" are printed in management server logs when I try to create a simple CentOS 5.5 NoGUI KVM instance after a complete and fresh install of ACS (even of CentOS). My main doubt here is if I can successfully configure an advanced zone with two networks but with untagged VLAN traffic ? I can't currently configure the router or switches to allow tagged VLAN networking as I am doing this project in my university. But, I have requested and gained access to the mentioned two networks: 192.168.20.0/24 and 172.16.20.0/16 and both networks are pingable and have internet access across all three machines. Can anyone help me with this please? Thanks, Parth Patel
