I haven two cluster setup, both on Ubuntu LTS and kvm. 
This has worked fine. 

BUT. 

One cluster is a tiny two node compute with 1 Raspberry Pi running all storage 
and management. 
Storage is a bit slow, but a dedicated external usb with an SSD was quite a bit 
faster. 
It is a toy compared to what most people on this list run. 

The second is an experimental cluster at work, but it is still small compared 
to others. 
1 management node 
1 storage node for both primary and secondary 
3 compute nodes 
They will be moved to a dedicated switch and converted to Rocky linux. 
When converted will likely pull a different version of kvm per previous 
discussions on this list. 
The short of it is the RedHat kvm rpm does not have all the features enable and 
some Cloudstack features wont work. 
If I remember correctly people used the epel kvm version with some success, 
including in production. 

I wrote some ansible roles to install both clusters, they are here with some 
example plays: [ https://gitlab.com/coledarr/cloudstack-roles | 
https://gitlab.com/coledarr/cloudstack-roles ] 
The roles, and example plays, will be updated as I finish the work on 
converting the work cluster to Rocky linux. 
But the work cluster is an experimental side project so it will be awhile 
before that happens. 

Darren 
-- 
This e-mail is confidential. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or 
the information it contains other than by the intended recipient is forbidden. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender (by return 
e-mail or otherwise) immediately and delete this e-mail. 


From: "Granwille Strauss" <granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID> 
To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 10:59:42 AM 
Subject: Re: Which linux system is recommended 



We currently run Cloudstack 4.17 on AlmaLinux 8. Both CM and KVM servers on 
AlmaLinux 8 OS. So far we're able to deploy publicly accessible VMs without any 
issues. However, it is a new setup, only time will tell. 
On 9/20/22 19:27, Wei ZHOU wrote: 



Regarding the Ubuntu 22.04, we have tested with CloudStack 4.17.0.0, there
are no issues found.
Therefore, since cloudstack 4.17.1.0 (will be released soon), Ubuntu 22.04
is officially supported by cloudstack.

-Wei

On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 19:16, Eric Green [ mailto:eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com | 
<eric.lee.gr...@gmail.com> ] wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

We have used both CentOS and Ubuntu. Currently we have standardized on
Ubuntu 20.04 LTS due to Red Hat shenanigans with CentOS and for
reliability reasons (Red Hat often broke Cloudstack with bug fixes for
CentOS, Ubuntu has never done so). Once a version of Cloudstack is
released that has been validated with Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and we have
validated it ourselves we will upgrade to that.

We currently have one old cluster running CentOS 7 (soon to be retired)
and a new cluster running Ubuntu 20.04LTS. Both are operating in the
same zone and pod without a problem, Cloudstack allocates virtual
machines across both clusters without a problem.

On 9/20/2022 8:05 AM, Mariusz Wojtarek wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Hi,

which linux system is recommended for cs and kvm? Debian ? ubuntu ?
fedora ? centos ?

Support Online





*Mariusz Wojtarek*

Administrator iT

*P: *22 335 28 00

*E: *mariusz.wojta...@support-online.pl [ 
mailto:mariusz.wojta...@support-online.pl | 
<mailto:mariusz.wojta...@support-online.pl> ] [ http://www.support-online.pl/ | 
www.support-online.pl ] [ http://www.support-online.pl/ | 
<http://www.support-online.pl/> ] Poleczki 23 | 02-822 Warszawa [ 
mailto:cidimage005.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110 | cidimage005.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110 ] 
< [ https://www.facebook.com/Support-Online-147141642016372 | 
https://www.facebook.com/Support-Online-147141642016372 ] [ 
mailto:cidimage007.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110 | cidimage007.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110 ] 
[ https://linkedin.com/company/support-online | 
<https://linkedin.com/company/support-online> ] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support OnLine Sp. z o.o., ul. Poleczki 23, 02-822 Warszawa, NIP:
951-20-32-692, Regon: 017431965, KRS: 0000078497,
XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego w Warszawie,
Kapitał zakładowy: 50 000 PLN - opłacony w pełnej wysokości.
W przypadku podania w ramach niniejszej korespondencji Państwa danych
osobowych, prosimy zapoznać się z następującą informacją [ 
https://www.support-online.pl/dane-osobowe | 
https://www.support-online.pl/dane-osobowe ] In case any of your private data 
was included within this
conversation, please consult this website [ 
https://www.support-online.pl/en/personal-data | 
https://www.support-online.pl/en/personal-data ] 



BQ_END


BQ_END

-- 
Regards / Groete 


[ https://www.namhost.com/ ]    Granwille Strauss // Senior Systems Admin 

e: [ mailto:granwi...@namhost.com | granwi...@namhost.com ] 
m: +264 81 323 1260 
w: [ https://www.namhost.com/ | www.namhost.com ] 

[ https://www.facebook.com/namhost ] [ https://twitter.com/namhost ] [ 
https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/ ] [ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos ] [ 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA ] 

[ 
https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner
 ] 


Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd , 
24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA 


The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by 
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is 
forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message 
to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this 
email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be 
held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy 
and disclaimers, please go to [ https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy | 
https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy ] 
[ 
https://www.adsigner.com/v1/c/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818 
] 

Reply via email to