On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ulrich Windl
<ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>>> Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> schrieb am 07.12.2015 um 22:40 in Nachricht
> <5665fcdc.1030...@alteeve.ca>:
> [...]
>> Node 1 looks up how to fence node 2, sees no delay and fences
>> immediately. Node 2 looks up how to fence node 1, sees a delay and
>> pauses. Node 2 will be dead long before the delay expires, ensuring that
>> node 2 always loses in such a case. If you have VMs on both nodes, then
>> no matter which node the delay is on, some servers will be interrupted.
>
> AFAIK, the cluster will try to migrate resources if a fencing is pending, but 
> not yet complete. Is that true?
>

If under "migrate" you really mean "restart resources that were
located on node that became inaccessible" I seriously hope the answer
is "not", otherwise what is the point in attempting fencing in the
first place?

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to