On 05/17/2016 01:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobre...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is >>>> it possible? >>>> Is there any examination about that? >> >> Indeed, would be *great* to have a Pacemaker based control plane on top >> of other "pluggable" distributed KVS & messaging systems, for example >> etcd as well :) >> I'm looking forward to joining any dev efforts around that, although I'm >> not a Java or Go developer. > > Pacemaker and corosync are written in C, so I suspect it would be > pretty awkward to replace corosync with something which isn't. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org >
Would be nice to see a clear picture for what is the coupling between those separate services making the Idea impossible? Is it libqb with its C-only API (wild guessing, sorry!), anything else? Theoretically, if there were no loose coupling, one could replace storage or messaging components or both and still leverage a Pacemaker CP :) -- Best regards, Bogdan Dobrelya, Irc #bogdando _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org