On 06/20/2016 03:58 PM, Digimer wrote: > Then wouldn't it be a lot better to just run your services on both nodes > all the time and take HA out of the picture? Availability is predicated > on building the simplest system possible. If you have no concerns about > uncoordinated access, then make like simpler and remove pacemaker entirely.
Obviously you'd have to remove the other node as well since you now can't have the single service access point anymore. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
