On 06/20/2016 03:58 PM, Digimer wrote:

> Then wouldn't it be a lot better to just run your services on both nodes
> all the time and take HA out of the picture? Availability is predicated
> on building the simplest system possible. If you have no concerns about
> uncoordinated access, then make like simpler and remove pacemaker entirely.

Obviously you'd have to remove the other node as well since you now
can't have the single service access point anymore.

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to