On 20/06/16 05:58 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 06/20/2016 03:58 PM, Digimer wrote: > >> Then wouldn't it be a lot better to just run your services on both nodes >> all the time and take HA out of the picture? Availability is predicated >> on building the simplest system possible. If you have no concerns about >> uncoordinated access, then make like simpler and remove pacemaker entirely. > > Obviously you'd have to remove the other node as well since you now > can't have the single service access point anymore.
Nikhil indicated that they could switch where traffic went up-stream without issue, if I understood properly. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
