On 04/17/2017 11:58 AM, Digimer wrote: > ... Unless I am misunderstanding, your comment is related to > serviceability of clusters in general. I'm failing to link the contexts. > Similarly, I'm not sure how this relates to "new" vs. "best"...
You can't know if *a* customer can access the service it provides. You can know if the service access point is up and connected to the server process. Take a simple example of shared-nothing read-only cluster: all you need to know is that the daemon is bound to '*' and the floating ip is bound to eth0. This is the "best" in that it's simple, stupid, does all you you need/can do and nothing that doesn't make your cluster run any "better". It's also very unexciting. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
