> maybe I need another coffee? No, I don't understand how it's relevant to the specific topic of avoiding split-brains, either. I suppose it's possible that I also need coffee.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote: > On 04/17/2017 11:58 AM, Digimer wrote: > > > ... Unless I am misunderstanding, your comment is related to > > serviceability of clusters in general. I'm failing to link the contexts. > > Similarly, I'm not sure how this relates to "new" vs. "best"... > > You can't know if *a* customer can access the service it provides. You > can know if the service access point is up and connected to the server > process. > > Take a simple example of shared-nothing read-only cluster: all you need > to know is that the daemon is bound to '*' and the floating ip is bound > to eth0. > > This is the "best" in that it's simple, stupid, does all you you > need/can do and nothing that doesn't make your cluster run any "better". > It's also very unexciting. > > -- > Dimitri Maziuk > Programmer/sysadmin > BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org