On 27/09/18 20:16, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Christine Caulfield <ccaul...@redhat.com> writes: > >> I'm also looking into high-res timestamps for logfiles too. > > Wouldn't that be a useful option for the syslog output as well? I'm > sometimes concerned by the batching effect added by the transport > between the application and the (local) log server (rsyslog or systemd). > Reliably merging messages from different channels can prove impossible > without internal timestamps (even considering a single machine only). > > Another interesting feature could be structured, direct journal output > (if you're looking for challenges). >
I'm inclined to leave syslog timestamps to syslog - rsyslog has the option for hi-res timestamps (yes, I know it stamps them on receipt and all that) if you need them. Adding 'proper' journal output sounds like a good idea to me though I'm not so much looking for challenges as looking to make libqb more useful for the people using it :) Chrissie _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
