On 02/20/2019 08:51 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 20/02/19 17:37 +0000, Edwin Török wrote: >> strace for the situation described below (corosync 95%, 1 vCPU): >> https://clbin.com/hZL5z > I might have missed that earlier or this may be just some sort > of insignificant/misleading clue: > >> strace: Process 4923 attached with 2 threads >> strace: [ Process PID=4923 runs in x32 mode. ]
A lot of reports can be found that strace seems to get this wrong somehow. > but do you indeed compile corosync using x32 ABI? (moreover > while pristine x86_64 libqb is used, i.e., using 64bit pointers?) > > Perhaps would be good to state any such major divergencies if > so unless I missed that. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org > https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org