On 20/02/2019 23:47, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 20/02/19 21:16 +0100, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> On 02/20/2019 08:51 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> On 20/02/19 17:37 +0000, Edwin Török wrote: >>>> strace for the situation described below (corosync 95%, 1 >>>> vCPU): https://clbin.com/hZL5z >>> I might have missed that earlier or this may be just some sort >>> of insignificant/misleading clue: >>> >>>> strace: Process 4923 attached with 2 threads strace: [ >>>> Process PID=4923 runs in x32 mode. ] >> >> A lot of reports can be found that strace seems to get this >> wrong somehow. > > Haven't ever seen that (incl. today's attempts), but could be: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/7/823 > > It's no fun when debugging tools generate more questions than they > are meant to answer. > >>> but do you indeed compile corosync using x32 ABI? (moreover >>> while pristine x86_64 libqb is used, i.e., using 64bit >>> pointers?) >>> >>> Perhaps would be good to state any such major divergencies if >>> so unless I missed that.
This is a pure x86-64 install, I didn't install any 32 or x32 binaries, must be strace itself reporting it wrongly. Best regards, --Edwin _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
