--- Antonio Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven:
>
> This flow-continuations stuff is so new that too few people have it clear
> enough to advise about the correct way to do what you requested.
> Currently, flow-continuations is still being defined. No one is trying to
> show if someone is bad or good coder. Everybody just try to give a tip
> that can help. Nothing more or less. Your idea to go to dev is good.
Of course! Thanks. I responded too quickly the first time, so I'm sure it
sounded bad.
/S
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo.
>
> Steven Cummings dijo:
> > No you didn't! I just don't think I explained my intentions well enough
> > at first (and the reponse seemed way too obvious at first). No biggy.
> > I'll try the dev'ers now. Thanks for the reponses!
> >
> > /S
> > --- Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Steven,
> >>
> >> Hope I didn't offend your programming sensibilities ;-)
> >>
> >> I'd recommend asking this on the developer list. There are more people
> >> doing this kind of stuff there, so you're more likely to get a decent
> >> answer.
> >>
> >> HTH. Upayavira
> >>
> >> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:04:08 -0700 (PDT), "Steven Cummings"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> > I'm not *that* bad a coder, I can make recursive calls in code! But
> >> I'm wondering how to ensure that a new continuation is created so
> >> that I can run a
> >> > "sub-" formwizard with it's own continuation and then use the old
> >> continuation
> >> > id to return from it. While I know how continuations are continued
> >> from the
> >> > flow examples, I don't know exactly how to break back into an
> >> xmlforms continuation with a particular id. It is built up a little
> >> more, at a high-level. And I don't immediately have any pipeline
> >> that takes a continuation
> >> > id like from the flow examples for the form and form-wizard
> >> frameworks. That is
> >> > my wondering.
> >> >
> >> > /S
> >> > --- Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > Steven,
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "Steven Cummings"
> >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> > > > Antonio,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > But how do you make a recursive call within the xmlform
> >> functionality?
> >> Do
> >> > > > you call it within the javascript or from a page to the desired
> >> pipeline?
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm an extreme newbie here, but:
> >> > >
> >> > > You do it the same as you would with any programming language:
> >> > >
> >> > > var continueRecursing = true;
> >> > >
> >> > > function foo() {
> >> > > if (continueRecursing) {
> >> > > sendPageAndWait(...);
> >> > > foo();
> >> > > }
> >> > > }
> >> > >
> >> > > Or, if you're using jxforms (flow enabled xmlforms), then you'll
> >> use sendForm() instead of sendPageAndWait().
> >> > >
> >> > > Hope that helps a bit.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Upayavira
> >> > > > --- Antonio Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > > > Steven Cummings dijo:
> >> > > > > > Hello all,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I've got kind of a hair-brained question here, forgive me if
> >> it is
> >> not
> >> > > > > > completely clear. I'm having a hard time thinking of how to
> >> create
> >> a
> >> > > > > > flow and forms for editing a complex, highly nested, and
> >> even recursively defined bean.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Let's say I have a bean class A with property of class B. B
> >> also
> >> has an
> >> > > > > > optional property of type B.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > My best thinking is that when I come to those items in the
> >> xmlform,
> >> I
> >> > > > > > will display a link to another flow, so that a "sub-form" is
> >> navigated
> >> > > > > > to. Cramming everything into one form is, of course, not a
> >> very
> >> good
> >> > > > > > option. Anyway, the theoretical solution presents me with
> >> two
> >> problems:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 1. Could the new form and continuation be passed the old
> >> continuation,
> >> > > > > > and access objects from the old flow?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I am not sure, but maybe a recursion of the same function
> >> would work
> >> > > here.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Please comments.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > 2. Could the new flow return to continue the old
> >> continuation once
> >> it
> >> > > > > > was done?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > See above.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I might possibly go as much as two or three continuations
> >> deeps.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > If the recursion can work here, the answer is yes. :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Remember that each is pretty much an XMLForm wizard
> >> implementation,
> >> so
> >> > > > > > I'm not writing any other low-level flow code except that to
> >> control
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > form wizard much like in the xmlform samples.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I haven't looked into woody that much yet, so if I'm missing
> >> something
> >> > > > > > easier there, let me know. If anybody has any good pointers
> >> or
> >> general
> >> > > > > > suggestions I would appreciate it! Surely someone else has
> >> had to
> >> deel
> >> > > > > > with beans that weren't "skin-deep" and contained further
> >> complex
> >> > > types.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > TIA
> >> > > > > > /S
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > __________________________________
> >> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> >> > > > > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> >> > > > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To
> >> > > > > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > __________________________________
> >> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> >> > > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> >> > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________
> >> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> >> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
