> > -----Message d'origine----- > De: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: mardi, 28. octobre 2003 19:02 > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet: Re: JXForms vs. Woody vs. KISS > > Well, not later than this afternoon, I had a meeting with MVC zealots > that were only speaking of "pure" MVC, Struts, "pure" JSP (no code), > etc. I demonstrated them flowscript and woody (using my GT > presentation > which you can find in the cocoon downloads) and we ended the meeting > with them saying "wow, this is a really clean MVC with strong > separation > of concerns, and looks very easy to use". > > I found by experience that using Woody + Flowscript involves > really few > technologies: Javascript for the flow (but don't you already > know it if > you know HTML and/or Java?) and a lightweight declarative markup (the > woody form definition). Not more than that.
Just one question from a woody novice: why using Javascript? I think that Java language is more practical and powerful. XMLForm used Java for the flow and this was a good solution I think. Regards Sylvain (T) > > Ah yes, you also need to learn a bunch of "wt:" elements for the form > template. But even this can be avoided: before the abovementioned > meeting, I hacked a 20-lines XSL that turns a plain old HTML page > (without any single additional attribute) into a woody template. > > Sylvain > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
