Re: Jetty included w/ Cocoon

[Upayavira]

beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote:

So chaps,
is jetty a better proposition than tomcat?
In my installation, Tomcat failed regularly (every day or two). Jetty 
fails only when the processor can't cope (bad design of my Cocoon app).

Regards, Upayavira



Uzo
On 23 Dec 2003, at 19:20, Tony Collen wrote:
Litrik De Roy wrote:

Mark Lundquist wrote:

Right now, for development, I'm running Cocoon  2.1.2 inside the 
Jetty that comes included w/ the Cocoon distro.  Somewhere, I read 
something that gave me the impression that this Jetty is somehow 
stripped down, or otherwise not production-ready.

Someone must know — is there any reason why I should not use the 
Jetty included w/ Cocoon in a production setting?

At the office, we have been using the Jetty included in Cocoon for 
quite some time now as our production server. It is not exactly a 
high-volume site, but Jetty handles the load perfectly. It is very 
stable and reliable. And it was VERY easy to set up.
I'm so glad we got rid of Tomcat....


Yep... Jetty has treated me well... it is very stable.  Have you 
played with "Jetty Plus" yet?  The JNDI Datasource pooling looks 
interesting and useful.



Tony

Thanks  a lot,
Mark Lundquist


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]