yep, I am using ajp13. i presume cocoon folder and cocoon.war would sit in the root of jetty as per tomcat?

Uzo
On 23 Dec 2003, at 21:14, Upayavira wrote:

Don't understand what technique you're using to connect Apache/Tomcat. Are you using AJP13? If so, you can just shut down Tomcat and start up Jetty (making sure it's listening for AJP).

Regards, Upayavira

beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote:

cheers,
i will now investigate jetty and see what it is like.

i have tomcat setup with apache so that tomcat can be accessed minus :8080

so 12.0.0.1/examples leads me to the tomcat stuff

my apache workes2.properties file reads as:

[uri:127.0.0.1:8003]
info=Example virtual host. Make sure myVirtualHost is in /etc/hosts to test it
alias=myVirtualHost:8003


[uri:127.0.0.1:8003/ex]
info=Example webapp in the virtual host. It'll go to lb_1 ( i.e. localhost:8019 )
context=/ex
group=lb_1


[uri:/examples]
info=Example webapp in the default context.
context=/examples
debug=0

[uri:/examples1/*]
info=A second webapp, this time going to the second tomcat only.
group=lb_1
debug=0

[uri:/examples/servlet/*]
info=Prefix mapping

[uri:/examples/*.jsp]
info=Extension mapping

[uri:/examples/*]
info=Map the whole webapp

[uri:/examples/servlet/HelloW]
info=Example with debug enabled.
debug=10

[uri:/cocoon]
info=Example webapp in the default context.
context=/cocoon
debug=0

[uri:/cocoon/*]
info=Map the whole webapp

My question is, can i leave the code as is and access jetty using the same settings?


Uzo On 23 Dec 2003, at 20:59, Litrik De Roy wrote:

Upayavira wrote:

beyaRecords - The home Urban music wrote:

So chaps,
is jetty a better proposition than tomcat?


In my installation, Tomcat failed regularly (every day or two). Jetty fails only when the processor can't cope (bad design of my Cocoon app).


We have seen similar behavior when using Tomcat. We had to restart it multiple times per week, it was using a lot of resources (memory and CPU) and each and every upgrade we had problems with endorsed jars. Aaargh.

Jetty is so much smaller, leaner and stabler.

Regards, Upayavira

Uzo
On 23 Dec 2003, at 19:20, Tony Collen wrote:


--

Litrik De Roy
www.litrik.com



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to