Hi, I have no problem to donate the code to Cocoon.
Just want to know if the code needs to get some kind of approval before using the 'org.apache.cocoon' name. Oscar --- Geoff Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oscar Picasso wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am writing a Cocoon application. > > > > I would like to avoid renaming my packages in case there are useful for the > > cocoon community. > > > > Let's say I have the following classes: > > > > // Sitemap components > > - com.mycompany.cocoon.generation.CacheableVelocityGenerator > > - com.mycompany.cocoon.action.DefaultPathAction > > > > // An avalon component (but not a sitemap one) > > - com.mycompany.cocoon.components.DefaultPathProvider > > > > 1- Is it recommended or discouraged to use 'org.apache.cocoon..." instead > of > > 'com.mycompany.cocoon...' if I make the code publicly available? > > > > 2- In case the 'org.apache.cocoon' naming is recommended and supposing my > > classes are aimed at easing the creation of web sites. > > > > Is it better to name them like this: > > - org.apache.cocoon.generation.CacheableVelocityGenerator > > - org.apache.cocoon.action.DefaultPathAction > > > > or something like that: > > - org.apache.cocoon.sitebuilder.generation.CacheableVelocityGenerator > > - org.apache.cocoon.sitebuilder.action.DefaultPathAction > > This boils down to a licensing question. As I understand it, you cannot > use org.apache.cocoon package name unless your code is donated to Cocoon. > > Geoff > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
