Gergo Szakal wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 19:25:37 -0400
Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Gergo Szakal wrote:
FYI, the leader of m0n0wall, talking about the feature of his OS
mentioned that DragonFlyBSD is not even taken into consideration by
him to base his system on, 'cause it's 'desktop oriented.'
Actually that is partially untrue. Fred Wright said this...
Sorry, meant to show the URL:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/list-dev/showmsg.php?id=12/75
Manuel still hasn't really weighed in on DragonFly from what I have
gathered. And you can say that I somewhat pay close attention to
m0n0wall due to starting the pfSense project ;) At any rate, this is
now getting way off topic, sorry for the noise.
Scott
'The primary foci are as follows:
FreeBSD: Servers
NetBSD: Portability
OpenBSD: Security and Reliability
Dragonfly Desktops'
Maybe I misinterpret, but I really don't want to argue about this. The devs
know what their purposes are, and me, the user know what mine are. I don't care
about others. So far DF seems a superb system for me, and I like if the
purposes of a project are sharply outlined (improper English). So far I had
only 1 problem that I could not resolve, but that is pkgsrc-wip related. The
HDD containing my install is in the 2nd machine and works flawlessly.
Dragonfly is all about bringing clustering to the masses. It is pretty
well outlined in our goals section.
