On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Francois Tigeot <ftig...@wolfpond.org> wrote: > > Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you. > > I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than > rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its > snapshot distribution in different intervals for archiving purposes. > This is the one thing rsnapshot does extremely well; I was just trying to say > this is a good idea we should steal :-) >
hope Matt will agree ;-) --Siju