Hi Sergey, what exactly should be added to etc/config.properties to change
cxf context and 8181 port??




Sergey Beryozkin-2 wrote:
> 
> Starting with 2.2.4 it is also possible to configure an alias for the CXF
> servlet.
> Example :
> 
>> For the most part, in the spring config, instead of importing
>> META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-http-jetty.xml
>> you would import
>> META-INF/cxf/osgi/cxf-extension-osgi.xml
>>
>> The "address" used on jaxws:endpoint and such would just be:
>>
>> /blah
>>
>> with no http://host:port type thing.
> 
> would result in http://host:8181/cxf/blah URI being support but a given
> jaxws or jaxrs endpoint.
> 
> Port '8181' can be changed in the etc/config.properties. You can add an
> org.apache.cxf.osgi.cfg to /etc directory and set the 
> 'org.apache.cxf.servlet.context' property to say '/' or '/custom' and it
> will be used instead of 'cxf'. This property can also be 
> configured using shell config commands and indeed the changes can be
> persisted and restored after the restart  with the latest Karaf 
> fix from Guilluame.
> 
> cheers, Sergey
> 
>> On Mon October 19 2009 4:57:30 pm Oliver Wulff wrote:
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>> When a customer deploys several applications into an osgi container
>>>  (servicemix 4.x) each bundle configures/(instantiates) a jetty engine
>>> with
>>>  security configurations etc. An idea is to re-use the osgi http
>>> service.
>>>  Is this possible? Somehow, the osgi http service must know under which
>>>  circumstances the request should be dispatched to cxf.
>>
>> Yes.   Wit CXF less than 2.2.4, you would need the osgi http transport
>> for cxf
>> thing that smx 4 has in their svn repo someplace.   With 2.2.4, we moved
>> that
>> code into cxf where we can maintain it better.
>>
>> For the most part, in the spring config, instead of importing
>> META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-http-jetty.xml
>> you would import
>> META-INF/cxf/osgi/cxf-extension-osgi.xml
>>
>> The "address" used on jaxws:endpoint and such would just be:
>>
>> /blah
>>
>> with no http://host:port type thing.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dk...@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-OSGi-http-service-instead-of-jetty-engine-tp25965535p25998548.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to