On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:53:36 am KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote: > I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in > WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had no > real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on the > second effort. > > The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of classloader > problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving > this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible these > problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people > implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in > 10.3.3. > > After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I > wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation. It > could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also noticed > that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation has > the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar (I > only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does this > mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API?
On any Java6 implementation, you likely don't need the stax-api jar at all. Likely, WL already has it as well. Thus, I'd just remove it in both cases. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
