> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) > Subject: Re: JAX-WS implementation uses Stax, but not JAX-RS? > > On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:53:36 am KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote: > > I've been working on separate efforts using CXF, one using JAX-RS in > > WebLogic 10.3.3, and one using JAX-WS in WebLogic 10MP1. I've had no > > real trouble with the first effort, but I've effectively given up on > the > > second effort. > > > > The JAX-WS implementation in WebLogic 10MP1 fails because of > classloader > > problems with the Stax API. I've followed all the advice on solving > > this problem, but it just doesn't work in WL 10MP1. It's possible > these > > problems were fixed in WL 10.3.3 because I read about some people > > implementing particular solutions and having it work, but only in > > 10.3.3. > > > > After I reached this conclusion with the JAX-WS implementation, I > > wondered why I wasn't having trouble with the JAX-RS implementation. > It > > could very well be because I'm using WebLogic 10.3.3, but I also > noticed > > that the resulting set of libraries for the JAX-RS implementation has > > the "geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar", but not the Woodstox jar > (I > > only added jars that resolved issues in my implementation). Does > this > > mean that the JAX-RS implementation doesn't use the Stax API? > > On any Java6 implementation, you likely don't need the stax-api jar at > all. > Likely, WL already has it as well. Thus, I'd just remove it in both > cases.
Good to know, but WebLogic 10MP1 uses JDK 1.5, believe it or not.
