Can you put that code back in but then add a println or log or something in the 
two catch statements that are returning null and see if it’s now triggering 
those clauses?   If it returns false, we have to create a new class loader for 
the proxy class which could possibly be the issue.

If there is an issue and it’s returning false there, you might be able to see 
which class is causing the issue and make sure that’s available in your 
application thus allowing the “return true” to trigger.    

Likely there should be  a LOG.fine(…) there anyway to help diagnose this.   

Dan



> On Sep 18, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Veit Guna <veit.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sergey.
>  
> I compared 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 directly in GitHub and this commit caused the 
> issue:
>  
> https://github.com/apache/cxf/commit/6700967415f3e9bb1e62dcab1ea4e8660ed579b8
>  
> After removing it, compiling 3.0.6 locally and testing with it, results in a 
> nice flat line in the
> class load/unload diagram. CPU usage dropped to 10% again and memory looks ok.
>  
> So maybe you can figure out, what was the intention and how to avoid the 
> loading.
> Maybe result caching of the already loaded classes is a solution?
>  
> I'll do some additional tests though...
>  
> Thanks
> Veit
> -- 
> 
> 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. September 2015 um 14:36 Uhr
> Von: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
> An: users@cxf.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: NPE with message body writer during load
> Hi
> 
> I'm not seeing anything immediately obvious from:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6508?jql=project%20%3D%20CXF%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.6[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6508?jql=project%20%3D%20CXF%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.6]
> 
> There few changes done to the RS client code, but I'm not seeing what
> might've caused the extra class loading activity... Perhaps you can spot
> something from 3.0.6 changes ?
> 
> Thanks, Sergey
> 
> On 18/09/15 12:53, Veit Guna wrote:
>> Hi Sergey.
>> 
>> Thanks for the quick feedback!
>> 
>> We're using the apache httpclient wth 3.0.4 for some time now without a 
>> problem (except the ThreadLocal NPE sometimes on startup of the load test).
>> It's performing really well - to be honest.
>> 
>> We only changed the version in the POM for the tests of the various CXF 
>> Versions (3.0.4 to 3.0.7-SNAPSHOT).
>> Nothing else of the configuration changed. So something changed with 3.0.6 
>> that introduces higher cpu-usage
>> and increased class loading.
>> 
>> Yes, the thread is performing multiple invocations against his self created 
>> client proxy instance.
>> Glad to hear, that this doesn't seem to be the problem.
>> 
>> I haven't encountered any OOM yet. But I can perform another test that runs 
>> a longer period.
>> I'm not sure what causes the constantly increasing class loading. I guess 
>> that's also the reason why cpu-usage
>> and memory increases as well. With 3.0.4+3.0.5 class loading was a flat line 
>> (as you can see on the images).
>> 
>> Maybe I can take a heap dump and take a look at the allocated instances to 
>> get a clue what is going on.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Veit
>> --
>> 
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. September 2015 um 13:15 Uhr
>> Von: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
>> An: users@cxf.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Re: NPE with message body writer during load
>> Hi Veit
>> On 18/09/15 12:01, Veit Guna wrote:
>>> Hi Sergey.
>>> 
>>> It seems the "problems" came in with 3.0.6 - not with the ThreadLocal fix 
>>> you did in 3.0.7-SNAPSHOT :).
>>> 
>>> I'm using the CXF JAX-RS 2.0.1 client proxies using the apache httpclient 
>>> network driver. I haven't activated
>>> the "thread-safe" option for the client.
>>> 
>>> So you say that 3.0.4 worked well, because the clients closed themselves, 
>>> but that isn't true anymore for CXF version > 3.0.4?
>> 
>> I'm not asserting this is why you are observing a memory growth with
>> 3.0.7-SNAPSHOT. In fact, given that your case is the same thread doing
>> multiple invocations against the same proxy instance, it would not make
>> a difference because the proxy is alive all the time so no auto-closing
>> of the proxy resources happens.
>> 
>>> That means I have to close the client proxy after _each request_? How would 
>>> that look like? Cast to WebClient? This would
>>> introduce a lof of boilerplate code that I wanted to avoid using the client 
>>> proxy :).
>>> 
>> Yes, with proxy it would not look cool, WebClient.client(proxy).close().
>> However, I think I can try making proxies Autocloseable so that in try()
>> it can look neater. It won't make a difference in this case though.
>> 
>>> With "multiple invocations" you mean one thread performs multiple 
>>> invocations on the same client proxy instance? Or multiple
>>> threads using the same client proxy instance? The latter case shouldn't 
>>> happen in my usecase.
>>> 
>> Yes, I was thinking may be it is the latter, so closing explicitly does
>> not help...
>> 
>> Well, so I'm not sure what is causing some growth - no state -s
>> maintained, you do not get OOM though, right ?
>> 
>> May be the difference is you switched from Java HttpUrlConnection to
>> HttpClient ?
>> 
>> Cheers, Sergey
>>> Thanks
>>> Veit
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. September 2015 um 11:15 Uhr
>>> Von: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
>>> An: users@cxf.apache.org
>>> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: NPE with message body writer during load
>>> Hi Veit
>>> 
>>> Thanks for this thorough analysis. The fix I did does not introduce some
>>> state.
>>> 
>>> Are you using 2.0 API ? I think in 3.0.4 WebClients (used internally in
>>> 2.0 impl) were closing themselves automatically in its finalize(). 2.0
>>> API effectively requires a new instance per every target, so they are
>>> kept in a weak hash map - but auto-closing the weakly collected clients
>>> caused some side-effects in the production.
>>> 
>>> So please make sure a Webclient or JAX-RS 2.0 client is closed between
>>> multiple invocations.
>>> 
>>> If that does not help then I'd need a maven test project so that I can
>>> have a look at the code and experiment...
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>> On 18/09/15 08:35, Veit Guna wrote:
>>>> Mkay. It seems attachments get filtered out. So I uploaded them here:
>>>> 
>>>> http://s17.postimg.org/vy88qvbtr/cxf304.png[http://s17.postimg.org/vy88qvbtr/cxf304.png]
>>>> http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png[http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png][http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png[http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png]][http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png[http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png][http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png[http://s17.postimg.org/kn5l2i4yn/cxf305.png]]]
>>>> http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png[http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png][http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png[http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png]][http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png[http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png][http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png[http://s17.postimg.org/qpd7szten/cxf306.png]]]
>>>> http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png[http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png][http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png[http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png]][http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png[http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png][http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png[http://s17.postimg.org/sv7inhwv3/cxf307.png]]]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. September 2015 um 09:04 Uhr
>>>> Von: "Veit Guna" <veit.g...@gmx.de>
>>>> An: users@cxf.apache.org
>>>> Betreff: Aw: Re: NPE with message body writer during load
>>>> Hi Sergey.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the fix.
>>>> 
>>>> Now I had time to test the new 3.0.7-SNAPSHOT version. Although I couldn't 
>>>> reproduce the error again, I encountered other
>>>> side effects.
>>>> 
>>>> It seems that now many class load/unload operations are performed. With 
>>>> 3.0.4, it was a flat line. Now it goes up and down between 5k and 8,5k 
>>>> loads/unloads.
>>>> Also, it seems that more memory is needed and CPU usage went from ~10% to 
>>>> ~20%-30%.
>>>> 
>>>> So I performed our test with 2 runs, using versions 3.0.4 - 
>>>> 3.0.7-SNAPSHOT. Please find attached the jvisualvm images for each version.
>>>> The test uses 50 threads and runs REST CRUD operations concurrently 
>>>> against a server. I connected the jvisualvm to the testcase for
>>>> monitoring.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3.0.4: 154s, 147s
>>>> - "original"
>>>> 3.0.5: 146s, 146s
>>>> - almost the same as 3.0.4
>>>> 3.0.6: 164s, 165s
>>>> - classloading peaks
>>>> - higher cpu: 20%-30%
>>>> 3.0.7: 177s, 163s
>>>> - classloading peaks
>>>> - higher cpu: 20%-30%
>>>> 
>>>> So it seems, that the load/unload came in with 3.0.6 which results in 
>>>> ~20secs longer runtime of the test
>>>> and higher CPU usage.
>>>> 
>>>> Any idea what causes this?
>>>> 
>>>> I also tested the CXF client within our server application. Here class 
>>>> loading is constantly increasing from 25k, up to 45k+ - without any 
>>>> occuring unloading.
>>>> Performing a manual GC via jvisualvm does not have any effect on that. So 
>>>> I guess it is leaking somewhere?
>>>> Test runtime went up from 115secs (3.0.4) to 470secs (3.0.7-SNAPSHOT).
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Veit
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. September 2015 um 13:56 Uhr
>>>> Von: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
>>>> An: users@cxf.apache.org
>>>> Betreff: Re: NPE with message body writer during load
>>>> This particular issue has been addressed:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593][https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593]][https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593][https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6593]]]
>>>> 
>>>> However this is a short term solution and a more effective solution
>>>> would need to be done in a new trunk.
>>>> 
>>>> The way the thread local proxies are managed is somewhat complex in CXF
>>>> JAX-RS - partially because the bulk of it was written many years back
>>>> and also because the same provider or resource instance can be shared
>>>> between multiple endpoints. We can investigate how the code can be
>>>> re-written when a new Java 8 trunk opens
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/09/15 11:49, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>>>> FYI, two more similar issues have been reported in the last couple of 
>>>>> days.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I start suspecting it might be a WeakHashMap optimization I did. In
>>>>> TomEE, the guys wanted to do a clean refresh of CXF (JAX-RS) module and
>>>>> the fact the bus was holding strong references to CXF context
>>>>> implementations such as UriInfoImpl, etc, was problematic (I'll need to
>>>>> ask Romain for few more details on that). So 'refresh' situations can
>>>>> possibly release the thread local proxies's content, just speculating
>>>>> but may be it is related
>>>>> 
>>>>> So I'm on this issue now :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks, Sergey
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 02/09/15 12:24, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When CXF JAX-RS injects thread-local proxies into providers/resource
>>>>>> classes it keeps field and method proxy maps on the bus. I recall there
>>>>>> was a problem in one of the complex setups where there were many
>>>>>> endpoints with multiple Jackson instances (as opposed to a single
>>>>>> instance shared between the endpoints) where somehow the provider whose
>>>>>> thread local proxy was reset depending on the order of the provider
>>>>>> initialization.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I vaguely recall the side-effect was caused by the fact there were
>>>>>> different bus instances involved too, this case is now tested in this
>>>>>> context:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]]]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systest[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systest]
> s
> /jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml][https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml[https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/systests/jaxrs/src/test/resources/jaxrs_jackson_provider/WEB-INF/beans.xml]]]]]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (one of the endpoints has a custom bus)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Perhaps when a client is set up in a complex, possibly multi-threaded
>>>>>> environment some side-effects with setting tl proxies are possible.
>>>>>> Example if it is a single/default bus that is shared between all the
>>>>>> clients then if we have multiple threads then they affect the th maps
>>>>>> kept on the bus.
>>>>>> Please experiment with trying to have each client instance have its own
>>>>>> Bus ? (You can create a unique bus with BusFactory and then set it on
>>>>>> JAXRSClientFactoryBean before creating a proxy) - if that helps than you
>>>>>> can limit such a setup to a test env only unless the actual production
>>>>>> setup is also multi-threaded
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> HTH, Sergey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 02/09/15 11:33, Veit Guna wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm using CXF 3.0.4 in client proxy mode, using my server REST
>>>>>>> interfaces.
>>>>>>> In addition I'm using the httpclient cxf module to workaround earlier
>>>>>>> problems with concurrency
>>>>>>> under load (as suggested by Sergey in a post some months ago here on
>>>>>>> the mailing list).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For Multipart handling I'm using the jersey MultiPart JAX-RS
>>>>>>> MessageBodyWriter on the server
>>>>>>> as well as on the client.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Under normal circumstances all goes well. But sometimes, especially on
>>>>>>> the startup-phase of the load test,
>>>>>>> the CXF client proxy dies with the exception below during a Multipart
>>>>>>> POST. Any clue what might cause this?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log Caused by:
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.interceptor.Fault: No message body writer has been
>>>>>>> found for class org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.MultiPart,
>>>>>>> ContentType: multipart/mixed
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.ClientProxyImpl$BodyWriter.doWriteBody(ClientProxyImpl.java:814)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.AbstractClient$AbstractBodyWriter.handleMessage(AbstractClient.java:1042)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:307)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.AbstractClient.doRunInterceptorChain(AbstractClient.java:624)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.ClientProxyImpl.doChainedInvocation(ClientProxyImpl.java:674)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.ClientProxyImpl.invoke(ClientProxyImpl.java:224)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> com.sun.proxy.$Proxy484.create(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> my.class.doSomething(MyClass.java:383)
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log ... 54 more
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log Caused by:
>>>>>>> javax.ws.rs.ProcessingException: No message body writer has been found
>>>>>>> for class org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.MultiPart, ContentType:
>>>>>>> multipart/mixed
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.AbstractClient.reportMessageHandlerProblem(AbstractClient.java:741)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.AbstractClient.writeBody(AbstractClient.java:470)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.ClientProxyImpl$BodyWriter.doWriteBody(ClientProxyImpl.java:804)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log ... 62 more
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.tl.ThreadLocalProviders.getMessageBodyWriter(ThreadLocalProviders.java:46)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.internal.MultiPartWriter.writeTo(MultiPartWriter.java:222)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.internal.MultiPartWriter.writeTo(MultiPartWriter.java:79)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils.writeMessageBody(JAXRSUtils.java:1379)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log at
>>>>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.AbstractClient.writeBody(AbstractClient.java:456)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 0f5ba696ffe4 fns-service.log ... 63 more
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Beryozkin
>>>> 
>>>> Talend Community Coders
>>>> http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]]]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]]]]]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sergey Beryozkin
>>> 
>>> Talend Community Coders
>>> http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/][http://coders.talend.com/[http://coders.talend.com/]]]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>  

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to