No change without setting swagger2customizer..

I'll let it rest for a day..

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:30 PM, nino martinez wael <
[email protected]> wrote:

> yup have set skip.default.json.provider.registration..
>
> But no matter what I do it has no effect on what the swagger feature
> generates.. Where it's changing the json provider or removing it all
> together..
>
> Trying it now without setting swagger2Customizer..
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Just FYI, removing Jettison lib will ensure it's not auto-installed by
>> CXF, and if it is not possible to remove then the other option is to set
>> a "skip.default.json.provider.registration" bus property.
>>
>> However it's not related to Swagger at all, Jettison if installed will
>> only affect the way JSON is generated for service responses
>>
>> Sergey
>>
>> On 30/11/17 11:57, nino martinez wael wrote:
>>
>>> It does not seem to be a jettison problem.. And neither an problem with
>>> jackson versions, I just wiped all jettison and jackson(except 2.9.1 )
>>> versions from my running environment..
>>>
>>> Looking into of it could be something with JacksonJaxbJsonProvider vs
>>> JacksonJsonProvider
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:45 PM, nino martinez wael <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> IS there somewhere while on runtime where I can print current registered
>>>> providers for cxf, I have a feeling that it somehow are using jettison
>>>> for
>>>> json...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM, nino martinez wael <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay I will check into libraries whats on class path.. I have the same
>>>>> gut feeling that it could be something like that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have enunciate up and working on the side..
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the minor Swagger version caused this change, what was working
>>>>>> 3.1.x, specifically the serializers approach, was not working any
>>>>>> longer
>>>>>> with the new Swagger version, hence this update.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I honestly do not know why exactly a JAXB annotated bean is not
>>>>>> correctly represented in the Swagger-generated #definitions, it's
>>>>>> obviously
>>>>>> something to do with the way Jackson and JAXB interacts.
>>>>>> Perhaps Jackson you register with DOSGI is not the same version
>>>>>> installed by the CXF swagger2 feature, perhaps some diff JAXB
>>>>>> versions are
>>>>>> involved, please keep experimenting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>
>>>>>> defaultSwagger2Serializers.setJavadocProvider(new JavaDocProvider());
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> swagger.setSwagger2Serializers(defaultSwagger2Serializers);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this could be the same:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Swagger2Customizer swagger2Customizer = new Swagger2Customizer();
>>>>>>> swagger2Customizer.setJavadocProvider(new JavaDocProvider());
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> swagger.setCustomizer(swagger2Customizer);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have setup CXF to use JACKSON (JacksonJaxbJsonProvider)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can I tell swagger to do the same? I think that's the problem..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:50 AM, nino martinez wael <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Im wondering if this could be the problem :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/issues/960
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM, nino martinez wael <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I have a bean CXF accepts only this interpretation for my
>>>>>>>> endpoint:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>       "contactList": [
>>>>>>>>>           {
>>>>>>>>>               "campaignId": "2",
>>>>>>>>>               "id":"",
>>>>>>>>>               "indexNumber": "",
>>>>>>>>>               "accountNumber": "232",
>>>>>>>>>               "queueNumber": "0",
>>>>>>>>>               "balance": 0,
>>>>>>>>>               "personalIdentificationNumber1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "firstName1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "lastName1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "personalIdentificationNumber2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "firstName2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "lastName2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "address": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "zipCode": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "city": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "homePhone": "+4521",
>>>>>>>>>               "mobilePhone": "+45122",
>>>>>>>>>               "campaing": "string",
>>>>>>>>>               "dateForExtract": "string"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>           }
>>>>>>>>>       ]
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However the swagger feature are generating this as example:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>     "minimalContacts": [
>>>>>>>>>       {
>>>>>>>>>         "campaignId": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "id": 0,
>>>>>>>>>         "indexNumber": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "accountNumber": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "queueNumber": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "balance": 0,
>>>>>>>>>         "personalIdentificationNumber1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "firstName1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "lastName1": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "personalIdentificationNumber2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "firstName2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "lastName2": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "address": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "zipCode": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "city": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "homePhone": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "mobilePhone": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "campaing": "string",
>>>>>>>>>         "dateForExtract": "string"
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>     ]
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> MinimalContactWrapper
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
>>>>>>>>> @XmlRootElement(name = "contacts")
>>>>>>>>> public class MinimalContactWrapper {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @XmlElementWrapper
>>>>>>>>>       @XmlElementRef
>>>>>>>>>       @Valid
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min = 1)
>>>>>>>>>       private List<MinimalContact> contactList=new ArrayList<>();
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       public List<MinimalContact> getMinimalContacts() {
>>>>>>>>>           return contactList;
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       public void setMinimalContacts(List<MinimalContact>
>>>>>>>>> minimalContacts) {
>>>>>>>>>           this.contactList = minimalContacts;
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> MinimalContact
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.PROPERTY)
>>>>>>>>> @XmlRootElement(name="minimalcontact")
>>>>>>>>> public class MinimalContact {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=1, max=240)
>>>>>>>>>       private String campaignId;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private Long id;
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=1, max=240)
>>>>>>>>>       private String indexNumber;
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=1, max=20)
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       private String accountNumber;
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=1, max=8)
>>>>>>>>>       private String queueNumber;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private Float balance;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=11)
>>>>>>>>>       private String personalIdentificationNumber1;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=55)
>>>>>>>>>       private String firstName1;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=55)
>>>>>>>>>       private String lastName1;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=11)
>>>>>>>>>       private String personalIdentificationNumber2;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private String firstName2;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private String lastName2;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private String address;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private String zipCode;
>>>>>>>>>       private String city;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=20)
>>>>>>>>>       private String homePhone;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       @Size(min=0, max=20)
>>>>>>>>>       private String mobilePhone;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       private String campaing;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       @NotNull
>>>>>>>>>       private String dateForExtract;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
>>>>>>>>> Nino Martinez
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
>>>>>>>> Nino Martinez
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
>>>>> Nino Martinez
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
>>>> Nino Martinez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> Nino Martinez
>



-- 
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez

Reply via email to