:Hi,
:
:On both systems HAMMER was used. One small correction concerning the 2c/2t
machine, both compression programs did effectively utilize that CPU which had
an idle % of 0.0. It is the bigger machine, 16c/32t where the CPU isn't
effectively maxed out. I'll continue to try and investigate why and report back
if I find anything.
Generally speaking I wouldn't want these utilities to use all available
cpu threads by default. It's not usually a good idea for a program to
just assume that all the cpus are there for it (by default). But they
should have command line options that allow the number of threads to
be specified.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[email protected]>
