Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 14:40 +0100 schrieb Rodrigo Madera: > Now I'm curious, what did you understand?
I thought you would want to have shell commands to manage/administer the Declarative Services runtime. This is something which is in the works for FELIX-284. Regards Felix > > Thanks, > Rodrigo > > On 9/20/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oops, sorry, I completely misunderstood that one ... Of course shell > > commands may be implemented using Declarative Services. > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 14:55 +0200 schrieb Marcel Offermans: > > > I thought Rodrigo wanted to use declarative services to implement a > > > command. That should be possible, right? > > > > > > On Sep 20, 2007, at 14:48 , Felix Meschberger wrote: > > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Karl Pauls: > > > >> Can't see why not :-) > > > > > > > > Because there is no integration of Declarative Services with the Felix > > > > Shell yet :-) See FELIX-284. It is one of the top items on my plate, > > > > actually. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Felix > > > >> > > > >> regards, > > > >> > > > >> Karl > > > >> > > > >> On 9/20/07, Rodrigo Madera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> Does Felix support Declarative Services to be used with these > > > >>> kind of > > > >>> commands? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Rodrigo > > > >>> > > > >>> On 9/20/07, Rodrigo Madera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thank you! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards, > > > >>>> Rodrigo > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 9/20/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hello Felix Community, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Does Felix have an equivalent to Eclipse's CommandProvider > > > >>>>>> interface? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Yes. See: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-shell-service.html > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> I want to provide the "hello" command to the shell. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Also, is this defined in a standard or does every OSGi > > > >>>>>> implementation > > > >>>>>> have it's own shell extending model? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Unfortunately, no. Not yet at any rate :-) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> regards, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Karl > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thanks for your help, > > > >>>>>> Rodrigo > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Karl Pauls > > > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >>>>> --- > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
