Well did there is plan to create a common OBR (à la http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/) ?
2009/3/6 Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com>: > Indeed, it was not in early draft 2. But I have an older copy of the > RFC. But I'm looking further to the early draft 3. > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: >> On 3/6/09 3:02 PM, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >>> >>> I was also planning to create another implementation of Pax Web that >>> made use of Grizzly to implement the Pax Web extensions to HttpService >>> and people could decide between an jetty or grizzly based >>> implementation. >>> @Sahoo, can you point me to the R4.2 Http Service specs? Are they >>> based on RFC 66 - OSGi Web Container? >>> >> >> Yes, they are based on RFC 66. I am not sure if this has been released in >> the early draft of R4.2, but I think another early draft is planned soon. >> >> -> richard >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Sahoo<sa...@sun.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Yes, we plan to support the new R4.2 HTTP service spec in GlassFish v3. >>>> It >>>> will support war files being deployed as OSGi bundles. We already have an >>>> initial implementation of existing OSGI/HTTP service in GlassFish v3. >>>> The >>>> basic stuffs are working and I plan to finish it soon. >>>> >>>> Sahoo >>>> >>>> Richard S. Hall wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> There is potentially an update coming in R4.2 to HTTP Service which will >>>>> support installing WAR files, from what I understand. So, I imagine in >>>>> the >>>>> future this will be commonly supported by implementations. >>>>> >>>>> -> richard >>>>> >>>>> On 03/06/2009 09:43 AM, Stevens Gestin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well ... I'm using Mina, not Grizzly, for our server which is using NIO >>>>>> also. It's lite and powerfull... There are so many projects and >>>>>> frameworks >>>>>> that it's quite difficult to decide which one we can choose. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are looking for a powerfull OSGI Http Service. I would like to test >>>>>> PAX >>>>>> Web which offers the possibility to deploy war files. I will look at >>>>>> this >>>>>> one also. >>>>>> >>>>>> What we expect to do is: use a Http Service which allow deployment of >>>>>> WAR. >>>>>> Start our app console service which will deploy the war. Extends our >>>>>> app >>>>>> console with service extender pattern. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does someone do something similar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Stevens >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Richard S. >>>>>> Hall<he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought some people might find this interesting: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Grizzly-OSGi-Http-Service-Ready-for-testing-td22363119.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -> richard >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People > working on Great Projects at Great Places > Sent from: Cluj-napoca Cj Romania. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
