Allright, I've just added a jira issue : FELIX-1182 Thanks.
2009/5/27 Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> > Hi, > > On 26.05.2009, at 16:48, Mathieu Civel wrote: > > Hi Clément, >> >> I'm using the combo File Install/Config Admin to manage my instances >> (great >> combo :), and it works fine except for one case : >> >> When the config file adds a new property, not mentionned in the >> <properties >> propagation="true" updated="reconfigured"> clause, the new property isn't >> given in the Dictionary, but is well managed by the provides handler. >> >> >> Is that possible for you to check that or tell me that it's a wanted >> behavior ? >> > > I will not say that it's a "wanted" behavior. When I implemented the > updated callback, I wondered if such properties (propagated but not managed > by the handler itself) had to be injected in the updated callback parameter > or not. My first conclusion was not (simplicity)... but it makes sometimes > perfects to inject them. This will allow the object to be notified when new > service property are added. > > Could you open an issue about that? I will fix it ASAP. > > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Mathieu Civel. >> >> P.S. It seems that BND don't want a lowercase letter for manifest keys >> (tryed the ant task only), hence ipojo-log-level didn't work for me until >> i >> changed it to Ipojo-lol-level in the ipojo sources. >> > > > Good catch ! I will modify the property to support also IPOJO-log-level. > > Regards, > > Clement > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
