On 23 Jun 2014, at 03:25, "Mark Derricutt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2.5.0? What happened to to 2.4.1-SNAPSHOT that we're testing here? Or has > 2.4.1-SNAPSHOT turned into 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT? It was staged as 2.5.0 following this discussion on the dev list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg33273.html since it contains new features > Sounds like this is a rather fundamentally breaking bug which should probably > halt the release... Versions are cheap - if we decide to restage then I'd still lean towards staging this bugfix as 2.5.1 unless anyone had any strong objections And if we decide to release 2.5.0 (depends how many use cases this affects) then 2.5.1 won't be far away. > On 23 Jun 2014, at 12:09, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > >> Log an issue and I'll schedule it for 2.5.1 (the vote for 2.5.0 is already > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
