On 23 Jun 2014, at 08:11, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2014, at 03:25, "Mark Derricutt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2.5.0? What happened to to 2.4.1-SNAPSHOT that we're testing here? Or has >> 2.4.1-SNAPSHOT turned into 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT? > > It was staged as 2.5.0 following this discussion on the dev list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg33273.html since it > contains new features > >> Sounds like this is a rather fundamentally breaking bug which should >> probably halt the release... > > Versions are cheap - if we decide to restage then I'd still lean towards > staging this bugfix as 2.5.1 unless anyone had any strong objections > > And if we decide to release 2.5.0 (depends how many use cases this affects) > then 2.5.1 won't be far away. I’ve recreated the issue with a basic project, so have cancelled the release vote until this is fixed. >> On 23 Jun 2014, at 12:09, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >> >>> Log an issue and I'll schedule it for 2.5.1 (the vote for 2.5.0 is already >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
