On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Driessen < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Two small notes: > 1) the mentioned property "osgi.http.whiteboard.listener" is never > mentioned in RFC-189 -> should it be mentioned? > There were many refinements made to the spec after progressing from the RFP stage. Unfortunately since there isn't a public document for the draft spec yet (hopefully pretty soon) you'll have to take our word for it, sorry! :( Secondly, since the CT for the RI (felix http) isn't complete yet, it's possible that felix http is not yet working quite as expected. [Switching to Appeal mode] Sadly, this is due to not having the desired number of people available in the alliance to get all this great work done in a timely fashion (and I assure you it's very great work, with more exciting work coming down the line)! I encourage everyone to step up and join the OSGi Alliance to get this work progressing faster. To a very large degree this is the limiting factor for why spec progression is slow). [End Appeal mode] Sincerely, - Ray (disclosure, I'm a board member and co-chair of the EEG)
