Hi Ray,

I've now the same setup as you posted it but it still doesn't work :( No
Sysouts are printed on my console for contextInitialized.

I've copied the Testsetup to my Google Drive, so if you want you could have
a look on it:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bw1daHW2hcyZWFhlcldtdGV6alE&usp=sharing

Best regards,
Thomas

2015-05-12 22:33 GMT+02:00 Raymond Auge <[email protected]>:

> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ray,
> >
> > even though it might be a bit off-topic, but you started it ;)
> >
> > I encourage everyone to step up and join the OSGi Alliance to get this
> work
> > > progressing faster. To a very large degree this is the limiting factor
> > for
> > > why spec progression is slow).
> >
> >
> > For someone like me who only works on the OSGi related stuff like Pax Web
> > (btw. ServletContextListener work without any issues with it, it's just
> not
> > yet R6 compliant :-) ) and Karaf in his spare time, it's pretty hard to
> > join. There are a couple people out there with great ideas, but can't
> join
> > cause they don't work a company that is interested in funding such
> > involvement. Maybe you as a board member and co-chair for the EEG can
> help
> > those OpenSource folks to participate in this easier.
> > I know of at least one other person who would be willing to join in on
> this
> > but doesn't have a "sponsor" for it.
> >
> > regards, Achim
> >
>
> Thank you for your feedback Achim. There's no simple solution here as I'm
> sure you can guess. However, I certainly will keep this in mind.
>
> - Ray
>
>
> >
> >
> > 2015-05-12 17:18 GMT+02:00 Raymond Auge <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Driessen <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Two small notes:
> > > > 1) the mentioned property "osgi.http.whiteboard.listener" is never
> > > > mentioned in RFC-189 -> should it be mentioned?
> > > >
> > >
> > > There were many refinements made to the spec after progressing from the
> > RFP
> > > stage.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately since there isn't a public document for the draft spec
> yet
> > > (hopefully pretty soon) you'll have to take our word for it, sorry! :(
> > >
> > > Secondly, since the CT for the RI (felix http) isn't complete yet, it's
> > > possible that felix http is not yet working quite as expected.
> > >
> > > [Switching to Appeal mode]
> > > Sadly, this is due to not having the desired number of people available
> > in
> > > the alliance to get all this great work done in a timely fashion (and I
> > > assure you it's very great work, with more exciting work coming down
> the
> > > line)!
> > >
> > > I encourage everyone to step up and join the OSGi Alliance to get this
> > work
> > > progressing faster. To a very large degree this is the limiting factor
> > for
> > > why spec progression is slow).
> > > [End Appeal mode]
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > - Ray (disclosure, I'm a board member and co-chair of the EEG)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Apache Member
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
> &
> > Project Lead
> > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> >
> > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
>



-- 
M.Sc. Thomas Driessen
Software Methodologies for Distributed Systems
Institute of Computer Science
University of Augsburg
Universitätsstr. 6a
86135 Augsburg, Germany

Tel:    +49 821 598-2486
email: [email protected]

Reply via email to