Thanks. Much appreciated
On 6/19/15, 12:36 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bcanh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >Hi Frank, > >that site is not correct I'll change it asap. >Undertow is a special branch made by Harald, and I should have blocked him >in doing releases with the Pax-Web Versioning schema. >It's been a test only releases that he made to play with Pax CDI on a >green >field. I did some investigation but the Pax-Web-Undertow branch is >in no means compatible to the Pax-Web regular branches. >That means till version 4.1.x Pax Web is clean and running with up to >Servlet Support 3.1 including White-Board extender (which isn't compatible >to the R6 draft of a OSGi specified Whiteboard-Extension for HttpService). >With the 5.0 disaster Version 5 is burned for the Pax Web project >therefore >Version 6.0 (the current master) tries to pick up from the 4.x line with >the goal of having a OSGi R6 compliant Whiteboard Extender, which actually >removes lot's of the features Pax Web already supports. I'll try my best >to >have the Old-Pax-Web-Style Whiteboard Extender working the same way it is >right now together with a stripped down R6 Compliant Whiteboard Extender. >Right now I don't have any plans on adding Undertow support to the master >branch. This might be an issue for a future version. Right now only Jetty >with all features and Tomcat with a slightly reduced set of features are >supported. For production use I still recommend to use Jetty. > >concerning the undertow-branch and whiteboard support, as I'm not planning >in putting any efforts into that branch I doubt there will be any support >for it. > >anyone with free time to spent on adding support for undertow into the Pax >Web 6.0.0 (current master) line is more then welcome to do so. >As I only work on the Pax-Web project in my spare time (no funding at all) >resources are spare and therefore I focus on main issues. > >regards, Achim > > >2015-06-19 12:06 GMT+02:00 Frank Langel <fr...@frankjlangel.com>: > >> Thanks a lot for the quick response. >> - looking at the features file is a good suggestion, I should have >>thought >> of it in the first place >> - I like to use and test undertow, so my understanding is I need to use >>MX >> branch, which doesn¹t contain whiteboard extender which stops my bundles >> from working >> >> Allow the following questions >> 1. Will the whiteboard extender be included in the MX Branch going >>forward? >> 2. What is the future of pax web 5+. As per the website, it says that v5 >> and later, pax web will standardize on undertow. Is that understanding >>of >> mine correct? >> >> Thanks >> Frank >> >> >> On 6/19/15, 10:41 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bcanh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >first of all Pax-Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT and Pax-Web 5.0.0.Mx are different. >> >The Mx ones are the undertow branches which unfortunately got the >>version >> >and are completely different to the other versions of Pax-Web. >> >One big difference that branch is missing the well-known Whiteboard >> >Extender of the regular Pax-Web line. >> >Just one note, due to this the current Master of Pax-Web is version 6.0 >> >and >> >currently there is no plan on merging the undertow branch in to master. >> >So please beware in case you are betting on Undertow, you run without >> >support on it. >> > >> >Second, as all of the Pax-Web modules are usually tested with Pax-Exam, >> >they are known to work with different OSGi runtimes. >> >So Felix and Equinox both run fine with Pax-Web. >> > >> >For a list of dependent bundles, take a look at the Karaf Features >> >descriptor, it explicitly tells you which bundles are needed. >> > >> >Regards, Achim >> > >> > >> >2015-06-19 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: >> > >> >> You mean Pax Web 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> JB >> >> >> >> >> >> On 06/19/2015 10:21 AM, Frank Langel wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Has anyone succeeded running PaxWeb 5.0 on Felix ? I am sure its >> >>>doable, >> >>> but >> >>> I was wondering if someone has made some notes (i.e. list of >>dependent >> >>> bundles) to ease the installation process. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks in advance >> >>> Frank >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >> jbono...@apache.org >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >Apache Member >> >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>Committer & >> >Project Lead >> >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >> > >> >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org >> >> > > >-- > >Apache Member >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & >Project Lead >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
