On 2/27/13 1:42 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2013 1:16 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think the last time, Infra checked and the MD5 on the suspect mirror was
>> good and they thought it truly was a bad download which is why we do the
>> check in the first place. Did you actually find a bad MD5 file on a
> mirror?
>>
>>
>
> Not sure what you mean. We never look at MD5 files on mirrors for
> verification.
Yeah, I don't remember all the details. I think maybe they checked and
found that the binary was not corrupted, but was being delivered
incorrectly.
>
> The site in question had corrupted binaries which we found out by comparing
> the MD5 with that of the one from our dist site.
How do you check without just downloading the image?
>
> Om
>
>> On 2/27/13 12:22 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Justin Mclean
>>> <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> HI,
>>>>
>>>>> It looks like the particular mirror site has the files corrupted.
>>>> Do we need to tell INFRA?
>>>>
>>>> Justin
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we should. Not sure if they can do anything about it though. I
>>> remember telling INFRA about a such a site earlier - I dont think
> anything
>>> was done.
>>>
>>> Om
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui