On 2/27/13 1:42 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 27, 2013 1:16 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I think the last time, Infra checked and the MD5 on the suspect mirror was
>> good and they thought it truly was a bad download which is why we do the
>> check in the first place.  Did you actually find a bad MD5 file on a
> mirror?
>> 
>> 
> 
> Not sure what you mean.  We never look at MD5 files on mirrors for
> verification.
Yeah, I don't remember all the details.  I think maybe they checked and
found that the binary was not corrupted, but was being delivered
incorrectly.
> 
> The site in question had corrupted binaries which we found out by comparing
> the MD5 with that of the one from our dist site.
How do you check without just downloading the image?
> 
> Om
> 
>> On 2/27/13 12:22 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Justin Mclean
>>> <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> HI,
>>>> 
>>>>> It looks like the particular mirror site has the files corrupted.
>>>> Do we need to tell INFRA?
>>>> 
>>>> Justin
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think we should.  Not sure if they can do anything about it though.  I
>>> remember telling INFRA about a such a site earlier - I dont think
> anything
>>> was done.
>>> 
>>> Om
>> 
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to