I assume you don't have a requirement for 10.0? We were poking at what it would take to get Apache flex to work on 10.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote: Thanks for looking into this. As major 4.1 upgrade glitches go, at least it has a work around - change to thinner fonts so the blurring works to produce a similar result :-) This means we have to tweak some padding and add some one or two pixel offsets here and there, which is tedious but probably worth it to move to 4.9. Thanks again for the details, Tom On 27/02/2013 17:03, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Tom, > > It looks like it is a player change between version 10 and 11. You can't > set Flex 4.6 or 4.9 back to swf-version 10, because it won't run, but you > can take your 4.1 version, copy the 10.0/playerglobal.swc to > 11.0/playerglobal.swc and then set -target-player=11. > > -Alex > > > On 2/26/13 8:08 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > >> The 4.1, 4.6 and 4.9 builds I did were all viewed with the 11.6 debug >> Player, if that is any help. >> >> Tom >> >> On 26/02/2013 16:00, Alex Harui wrote: >>> Hmm, I thought it was a player change, but if you have older swf-version, >>> then maybe not. I will try to dig deeper later today or tomorrow. >>> >>> >>> On 2/26/13 7:28 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <t...@extravision.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Good idea. I changed to 4.6 and it matches the results from 4.9 i.e. >>>> worse than 4.1 - I've looked through the change logs for the 4.6 release >>>> and don't see anything relevant. Any ideas ? >>>> >>>> 4.6 is however it came with Builder 4.7, for 4.9 I'd adjusted >>>> flex-config.xml to Player 10.2 and swfversion 11 in >>>> ide/flashbulder/flex-config.xml but otherwise it's just how the >>>> installer left it. >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> On 26/02/2013 14:55, Alex Harui wrote: >>>>> Have you tried adobe 4.6? What swfversion are you using for 4.1? You might >>>>> be >>>>> seeing player change. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. >>>>> >>>>> Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yup; the same issue appears using the OpenSans-CondLight.ttf - comes out >>>>> bolder in Apache 4.9 builds vs. Adobe 4.1 at a font-size of 12 with a >>>>> color #333333 >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> On 25/02/2013 18:33, Om wrote: >>>>>> If it is a licensed font, maybe try to re-create this issue with a >>>>>> free font like Apache OpenSans available here [1] [1] >>>>>> http://www.google.com/webfonts#UsePlace:use/Collection:Open+Sans+Condensed >>>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >>>>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >>>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>>
