Not really : http://www.extravision.com/blog/flash-still-everywhere
Of those, Something like 93% are actually 10.2 or better, so getting
down to there would be good enough for us, which I think is where we are
now ?
Tom
On 28/02/2013 16:48, Alex Harui wrote:
I assume you don't have a requirement for 10.0? We were poking at what it would
take to get Apache flex to work on 10.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for looking into this.
As major 4.1 upgrade glitches go, at least it has a work around - change
to thinner fonts so the blurring works to produce a similar result :-)
This means we have to tweak some padding and add some one or two pixel
offsets here and there, which is tedious but probably worth it to move
to 4.9.
Thanks again for the details,
Tom
On 27/02/2013 17:03, Alex Harui wrote:
Hi Tom,
It looks like it is a player change between version 10 and 11. You can't
set Flex 4.6 or 4.9 back to swf-version 10, because it won't run, but you
can take your 4.1 version, copy the 10.0/playerglobal.swc to
11.0/playerglobal.swc and then set -target-player=11.
-Alex
On 2/26/13 8:08 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <[email protected]> wrote:
The 4.1, 4.6 and 4.9 builds I did were all viewed with the 11.6 debug
Player, if that is any help.
Tom
On 26/02/2013 16:00, Alex Harui wrote:
Hmm, I thought it was a player change, but if you have older swf-version,
then maybe not. I will try to dig deeper later today or tomorrow.
On 2/26/13 7:28 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <[email protected]> wrote:
Good idea. I changed to 4.6 and it matches the results from 4.9 i.e.
worse than 4.1 - I've looked through the change logs for the 4.6 release
and don't see anything relevant. Any ideas ?
4.6 is however it came with Builder 4.7, for 4.9 I'd adjusted
flex-config.xml to Player 10.2 and swfversion 11 in
ide/flashbulder/flex-config.xml but otherwise it's just how the
installer left it.
Tom
On 26/02/2013 14:55, Alex Harui wrote:
Have you tried adobe 4.6? What swfversion are you using for 4.1? You might
be
seeing player change.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote:
Yup; the same issue appears using the OpenSans-CondLight.ttf - comes out
bolder in Apache 4.9 builds vs. Adobe 4.1 at a font-size of 12 with a
color #333333
Tom
On 25/02/2013 18:33, Om wrote:
If it is a licensed font, maybe try to re-create this issue with a
free font like Apache OpenSans available here [1] [1]
http://www.google.com/webfonts#UsePlace:use/Collection:Open+Sans+Condensed
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
