Thank you all for your replies.

We have optimised the application a fair bit from the web version and
whilst there is always room for improvement, for now, we would like to get
the best possible hardware config to trial the app on.

There are some key points which are still slightly heavy which we can
revisit once we are happy with the hardware.

As Justin correctly suggest, the issue we are currently facing with the
Samsung Galaxy 3 tablet is the slower performance of Air apps on x86 tablet
(I've just voted on the bug in Adobe bug base and would plead with others
to do the same. In my opinion, the big attraction of Flex is the
multi-platform capabilities and anything that takes away from that takes
away from Flex itself). Anyway, with the x86 issue combined with the app
complexity, we are suffering on the performance side.

To compound our issues, these tablets are being used in farms and villages
in Africa where there is no Wifi connection of any sort. We have a data
update process when the tablets come back into wifi range which can have a
lot of data to shift dependant on how long the app has been out of contact
with wifi. So we are hitting performance problems in those areas,
supplemented by what will be flaky wifi connections. This data
synchronisation is obviously a key area we will look to optimise.

Thank you for the suggestion of the Kindle Fire HDX. Have you had good
experience with your Flex app on that tablet? We did consider dropping back
down to the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 but are wary about recommending older
hardware in terms of ongoing support from the manufacturer. We had a Galaxy
Tab 1 which lost support from Samsung after the Apple copyright case.

As mentioned we were impressed with the performance on the Sumvision
Cyclone and Aakash but required a higher screen res. Thinking about it, I
think we can get away with screen res height of approximately 800. The
cyclone and Aakash, both 800x480 pixels were a step too far, but a height
of 800 should be fine. So that opens up a range of cheaper tablets.

Has anyone had any experience of Flex on any of the following?

Hannspree 10.1" HANNSpad Tablet
PC<http://www.ebuyer.com/584232-hannspree-10-1-hannspad-tablet-pc-black-sn1at71bee>
10.1" 1280x800 10-point IPS touch screen
1.2 GHzQuad Core processing
16GB on board storage, 1GB DDR3 memory
£139.98

Asus MeMo Pad ME102A Tablet PC Product
Description<http://www.ebuyer.com/584198-asus-memo-pad-me102a-tablet-pc-me102a-1a034a>
Asus RK101 Quad Core 1.66GHz
10.1" Multi-Touch Capable
Resolution: 1280 x 800
£197.50

Zoostorm PlayTab Q6010 Tablet
PC<http://www.ebuyer.com/602649-zoostorm-playtab-q6010-tablet-pc-3305-6010>
Quad Core Rock Chip 1.5Ghz
2GB RAM + 16GB Flash
10.1" IPS Screen 1280 x 800 Resolution
£149.99


Has anyone run a Flex app on a Google Nexus of any kind/size? How did that
go?

This Amazon comparison page compares some of the big name tablets:

Amazon Tablet 
Comparison<http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/feature.html?&docId=1000759833&tag=googhydr-21&hvadid=35977828616&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=12649738051549580482&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_3pfj16aeph_b>

What should we look for in determining if a tablet will run a Flex app? In
addition to avoiding tablets with Intel processors for now, should we look
for anything else? Is there a list somewhere of tablets that support Adobe
Air? Or is it the case that most tablets now support Air? Is it easier to
list the exceptions?

Thanks again for any input

Ross


On 5 March 2014 02:26, <f...@dfguy.us> wrote:

> If you use scout to profile your app you can often identify the
> particularly troublesome spots where your application is slowing down. Once
> you find them you can often do some optimizations to improve performance
> even on less desirable hardware specifications.
>
> David
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> To: "users@flex.apache.org" <users@flex.apache.org>
> Sent: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Android tablet performance recommendations
>
> Ross,
>
> The Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9" might be a good bet [1]
>
> Of course, if you can get a hold of Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 or Note 2 that
> might work too.  They still work great with my Apache Flex apps.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BHJRYYS/ref=fs_ta
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you run the profiler to see if you can speed up your app?
> >
> > On 3/4/14 12:44 PM, "Ross Taylor" <ross.taylo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Can anyone recommend a reasonably priced Android tablet for running an
> > >application built using Apache Flex 4.11?
> > >
> > >Is there a set of specifications that we can check before buying a
> > >tablet to determine if it will run Adobe Air and therefore our
> > >application?
> > >
> > >We have a trial running in the field where we are able to control
> > >which tablets are used to run our application so we would like to
> > >select a tablet that would give the best possible performance.
> > >
> > >Unfortunately, we were initially supplied with Samsung Galaxy 3 10.1
> > >tablets and we are running into significant performance problems. I
> > >saw this message on the list:
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/AIR-on-Android-x86-ba
> > >sed-devices-td31724.html
> > >
> > >and it made sense of why our performance is so poor.
> > >
> > >We've tried running our app on a Sumvision Cylone Voyager and a
> > >Ubislate Aakash and got very decent performance, but unfortunately the
> > >screen resolutions are rather low on both devices. Perhaps that helps
> > >the performance, but our app requires a higher resolution for the user
> > >interface to work effectively.
> > >
> > >So we're looking for a device that will run our Apache Flex
> > >application at good performance speed with a good resolution (say
> > >minimum 1024 height) so I think the tablet needs to be bigger than 7".
> > >
> > >Any recommendations?
> > >
> > >Many thanks,
> > >
> > >Ross
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to