If i may ask, from your experience - do you refer to any main functions not 
being 100% complete, or is this generally more exotic ones? 
I checked the examples and 86 out of 87 went well (maybe there is different 
versions of the library).

And when you say it is slow (i read also other comments telling the same) does 
this only adress large scale pdfs with many pages or also other documents eg 
including high res DPI images?

I am curious, because i may want to use it inside a web2print scenario.

Thx,
Sascha 




> Am 11.11.2014 um 16:30 schrieb Paul Hastings <paul.hasti...@gmail.com>:
> 
> On 11/11/2014 2:16 PM, Sascha Ahrend wrote:
>>> Also are there alternatives to AlivePDF to create pdfs from a Flex
>>> application?
>> 
>> Yes, purePDF.
>> 
>> https://github.com/sephiroth74/purePDF 
>> <https://github.com/sephiroth74/purePDF>
>> 
>> It’s an AS3 porting of iText.
> 
> just FYI, its not a 100% complete port.
> 
> we've used both alivePDF & purePDF but ended up handing PDF generation to 
> iText on the server & passing back the URL to the generated PDF file. it was 
> considerably faster & gave us the most control over PDF generation.
> 

Reply via email to