Go for it. IIRC, there is an experiment going on at the ASF about signing binaries. I think the OpenOffice folks are driving it.
-Alex On 3/31/15, 4:47 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >I am assuming there are no objections to my proposal. If you are >interested in testing the apps, please let me know. > >Thanks, >Om > >On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:19 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala ><bigosma...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Now that 4.14.1 is out of the way, I want to concentrate on releasing >>the >> new Tour de Flex Mobile app on Google Play and Apple App stores. I have >> rebuilt the iOS and Android apps with the new skins and they do look >>pretty >> good, good enough to release. I plan to be the release manager for this >> release. >> >> Here are a few issues we need to consider: >> >> 1. The ASF does not currently have a way to let TLP projects to sign app >> store binaries. Instead of waiting on them, I plan to release it under >>my >> own name, but with enough disclaimers to say that this is an >>[un]official >> release of the Apache Flex project (only the binaries) We will be >> releasing the source under the normal release process, of course. >> 2. Does anyone want to suggest a better name than Tour de Flex Mobile? >> Or is this good enough? >> >> 3. Testing the binaries will be an interesting problem. >> >> a. For the Android platform, I can put up the .apk file on our Apache >> dist folder and ask folks to download it from there. >> b. As far as the iOS app goes, I am planning on creating a TestFlight >> team and send an invite to users@ and dev@ so that folks can sign up for >> testing those apps. >> >> Any suggestions or concerns, please feel free to raise them here. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >>
