To me, the key differentiators of FlexJS is: 1. We consider HTML a rendering engine rather than an authoring language. 2. End-to-end tooling which eliminates a lot of the pain points of web app development 3. MXML 4. Flexibly interchangeable component sets.
Point #1 can be considered an advantage or a disadvantage depending on your perspective. Our sweet spot is single page applications. We are not a great fit for web sites and multi-page applications. One area which will give some folks pause is the lack of automated testing. I think our strongest market at the moment is for migrating applications from Flash. I would like to see us strengthen our selling points for other devs as well. My $0.02, Harbs > On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > wrote: > > Hi Berty, > > I think all points are ok but the second (security) don't know how much > effort was put in that corner, maybe others could give some thoughts there, > and I think nowadays is a key point. > > Thanks! > > Carlos > > > 2017-09-19 4:15 GMT+02:00 Berty Tonta (Leadstalk) <berty.to...@leadstalk.pro >> : > >> My first short list of why people should go for FlexJS. >> Disclaimer: as a non-developer, I'm not sure if they really apply today to >> FlexJS and if there are more engaging features for developers. Would be >> great to have your confirmation. >> >> 1. Enterprise-class: for As3/Flex robust platform/architecture >> 2. Security: I need confirmation here. >> 3. Advanced multi-platform: Out of the box and future-proof (@Olaf, I >> agree) >> 4. Open-source: We must encourage more developers to embrace it and more >> organisations to buy-in...not just Adobe. >> >> If think the above list (or something along those lines) can send the >> message: "Hey, guys, this is serious stuff: We're taking Enterprse (not >> games), Security (at it's core), ADVANCED multi-platform (swift low-cost >> development/deployment) and a growing/serious community of contributors" >> >> OK now. How true is this? If not, is this compatible with the Vision for >> FlexJS? >> >> >> >> >> >> Berty Tonta >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> ________________ >> >> >> >> LEADSTALK - 4 BENGALI STREET, BEAU BASSIN, MAURITIUS >> TEL +230 57 43 81 34 - berty.to...@leadstalk.pro - LEADSTALK.PRO >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> an important thing for me is sustainability. >>> Every day a new JS framework is born and another dies. >>> Angular was written from scratch... all who have invested in Angular1 >> were >>> lost. >>> This is not suitable for the enterprise. >>> >>> My understanding is that FlexJS was built with the experience of over a >>> decade of Flex development. >>> So my hope is that the architecture is well-thought-out and future-proof. >>> >>> If we'll speak about WebAssembly or whatever other targets someday... >>> FlexJS >>> has the potential to fit for them all... hopefully ;-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Olaf >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/ >>> >> > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria.
