On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:41 -0400, Wayne Borean wrote: > In that case, you can see where I'm leading the conversation, and why my > concept of 'Free Software Darwinism' could be really important to us, and > scary as hell to Microsoft. > > Wayne > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:12 PM, plino <pedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > @Wayne > > > > Being a biologist, I find your Evolution parallel quite interesting. > > > > Answering your previous question: of course IBM has it's own flavour of > > Office (based on OpenOffice in fact): it's called IBM Lotus Symphony > > http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/home.nsf/products > > > > Enjoy! ;) > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ellison-s-Oracle-washes-hands-of-OpenOffice-tp2826546p2832723.html > > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org > > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ > > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > > deleted > > > > >
Wayne I would think some the hardware vendors would promote FOSS more. They can benefit from the hardware sales. I can see why MS hates FOSS, they are almost a pure software vendor and FOSS hurts their sales. -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
