HELP!!!!!!!!!!! I am receiving 20 and more emails daily. I have tried many, many times to unsubscribe with NO SUCCESS. PLEASE give me an email, land line, snail mail address, or phone number where I can UNSUBSCRIBE.
rich...@hornick.us -----Original Message----- From: Joep L. Blom [mailto:jlb...@neuroweave.nl] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:19 AM To: users@libreoffice.org Cc: Roland Hughes Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: > Joep, > > Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because > when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a > whole lot of trouble for doing it. > > Now, people who once got paid for writing a program or use Microsoft > products may well have different opinions since their not the ones > working on multi-million dollar projects for Fortunate 500 companies. > > There is a long drawn out history of people deleting what they didn't > read then denying things were said. > > Bottom posting wastes vast quantities of developers time scrolling to > the end. Full quoting is a policy mandated by most major corporations > and IT organizations because it allows management (and the legal team) > to jump into the conversation at any point. > > I wouldn't even be on this list had the Web site been designed by > software professionals instead of whoever was used. > > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 12:05 +0200, Joep L. Blom wrote: > >> On 30/05/11 08:45, Roland Hughes wrote: >>> Neither bottom nor interleaved posting methods are used by professional >>> IT workers. Microsoft developers yes, but not professionals. >>> >> >> Sigh! Roland your remark is utter nonsens. Many lists courteously >> request to bottom post but also request clipping. Professional IT >> workers remove unnecessary wording from replies and adhere to >> courteously requested rules. >> Joep >> >> >> > > Roland, Permit me to disagree. If you need E-mails for court representation it is best to furnish the original E-mails not the parts of text in answers to E-mails. You answer the relevant portions of an E-mail as the originator has the original text. I don't think a court will accept the umptieth repeat of an original E-mail. But I live in the Netherlands and I have no idea how convoluted American lawyers and justices actually reason. Well, that goes for Dutch members of that kind also. It is a breed that I, as a simple scientist, not understand so therefore your reasoning might be right. Joep -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
