Richard, Specifying Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> messages as junk/spam ON THE EMAIL SERVER will stop them from ever being downloaded!
Roland On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 18:19 -0400, Richard wrote: > Thanks. > I do have a way to specify these messages as JUNK, and not even open them, > BUT, they are still downloaded before being rejected as junk, so I get all > this garbage going thru my system before the being dumped into the trash. > $*#@*&* > You get the idea. > Thanks for your input, Roland. > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Hughes [mailto:rol...@logikalsolutions.com] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 4:23 PM > To: users@libreoffice.org > Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken > > Richard, > > If actual IT professionals set up the server correctly, you send a > COMPLETELY EMPTY MESSAGE to users+h...@libreoffice.org > > No SIG files, no subject, no message body. > > Given the organization of the Web site, and those genetic miss-fits from > management that hang out here and speak directly out their rectal > orifice without even the tiniest shred of knowledge...I would not be > surprised to find out that doesn't work either. > > Management = genetic miss-fits promoted to their level of inability. > > Of course, you email system ought to provide a Web interface. Open your > browser without your email client being opened and go to that Web page. > Find messages from > > Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> > > and flag them as junk mail. Do this on the server via the Web interface > and it will stop gigs of useless bits from attempting to come down your > dial up connection. > > > > > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 13:31 -0400, Richard wrote: > > > HELP!!!!!!!!!!! > > I am receiving 20 and more emails daily. I have tried many, many times to > > unsubscribe with NO SUCCESS. > > PLEASE give me an email, land line, snail mail address, or phone number > > where I can UNSUBSCRIBE. > > > > rich...@hornick.us > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joep L. Blom [mailto:jlb...@neuroweave.nl] > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:19 AM > > To: users@libreoffice.org > > Cc: Roland Hughes > > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] <OT>Re: Sun Weblog Publisher broken > > > > On 30/05/11 15:58, Roland Hughes wrote: > > > Joep, > > > > > > Professional IT workers never remove any portion of the post because > > > when you go through a SOX audit, and then through court, you get in a > > > whole lot of trouble for doing it. > > > > > > Now, people who once got paid for writing a program or use Microsoft > > > products may well have different opinions since their not the ones > > > working on multi-million dollar projects for Fortunate 500 companies. > > > > > > There is a long drawn out history of people deleting what they didn't > > > read then denying things were said. > > > > > > Bottom posting wastes vast quantities of developers time scrolling to > > > the end. Full quoting is a policy mandated by most major corporations > > > and IT organizations because it allows management (and the legal team) > > > to jump into the conversation at any point. > > > > > > I wouldn't even be on this list had the Web site been designed by > > > software professionals instead of whoever was used. > > > > > > On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 12:05 +0200, Joep L. Blom wrote: > > > > > >> On 30/05/11 08:45, Roland Hughes wrote: > > >>> Neither bottom nor interleaved posting methods are used by professional > > >>> IT workers. Microsoft developers yes, but not professionals. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Sigh! Roland your remark is utter nonsens. Many lists courteously > > >> request to bottom post but also request clipping. Professional IT > > >> workers remove unnecessary wording from replies and adhere to > > >> courteously requested rules. > > >> Joep > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > Roland, > > Permit me to disagree. If you need E-mails for court representation it > > is best to furnish the original E-mails not the parts of text in answers > > to E-mails. You answer the relevant portions of an E-mail as the > > originator has the original text. I don't think a court will accept the > > umptieth repeat of an original E-mail. But I live in the Netherlands and > > I have no idea how convoluted American lawyers and justices actually > > reason. Well, that goes for Dutch members of that kind also. It is a > > breed that I, as a simple scientist, not understand so therefore your > > reasoning might be right. > > Joep > > > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org > > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ > > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > > deleted > > > > > > > -- > Roland Hughes, President > Logikal Solutions > (630)-205-1593 > > http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com > http://www.infiniteexposure.net > > No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol > reserves. > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > -- Roland Hughes, President Logikal Solutions (630)-205-1593 http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com http://www.infiniteexposure.net No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol reserves. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
